0068 The Impact of Transcutaneous Vagal Nerve Stimulation on Sleep-Dependent Emotional Memory

Rene Perez,Lauren Whitehurst,Anjana Subramoniam,Gabriel Gilmore
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsae067.0068
IF: 6.313
2024-04-20
SLEEP
Abstract:Abstract Introduction The autonomic nervous system (ANS) supports memory, with peripheral activity, through the vagus nerve, enriching or impairing acquisition and consolidation, especially for emotional experiences. Sleep is critical for memory consolidation and has been implicated in affective regulation. Yet, the causal impact of the ANS during sleep for memory has not been rigorously assessed. The current project examined the impact of non-invasive vagal nerve stimulation during sleep on emotional memory consolidation Methods 24 participants (Mean age = 22.82; 13 Male; 11 Female) completed two nights of polysomnographic recordings - one with 90-mins of active transcutaneous vagal nerve stimulation during NREM sleep and one with sham stimulation - counterbalanced across participants. Emotional memory was assessed via a picture recognition task. Sixty images were presented during a pre-sleep encoding session (30 negative and 30 neutral). Recognition memory (15 old/negative, 15 old/neutral, 15 new/negative and 15 new/neutral) was assessed twice, 30-mins after encoding (Test 1) and post-sleep (Test 2). Outcome metrics included d’ (sensitivity), c (bias criterion), and c’ (corrected sensitivity). Change scores (Test 2 -1) were calculated. Mixed-model repeated measures ANOVAs with self-reported biological sex as a between-subjects factor were used to assess the impact of stimulation (active vs sham) and valence conditions (negative vs neutral) on memory processing. Results For d’, a significant sexXstimulation interaction emerged, F(1,22)=6.66,p =0.017. Male participants performed better in the sham condition (p=0.035), but this effect was attenuated in the stimulation condition (p=0.236). Participants exercised a stricter criterion when receiving active vs. sham stimulation and were less likely to indicate that they remembered stimuli that they viewed during encoding at test (p=.051). Given this, we examined c’ to adjust for response bias. We found a significant effect of emotion (p=.025) and a marginal effect of stimulation condition (p=.058). Across sleep, participants were better at discriminating between previously encoded neutral images than negative images. Sleep-dependent discrimination performance also improved after active stimulation (c’=0.086) but declined under sham (c’=-0.018; p=.058). Conclusion These are the first data to suggest causal links between sleep-dependent autonomic activity and next-day memory processing. Analyses of polysomnographic sleep features linked to these outcomes are in progress. Support (if any)
neurosciences,clinical neurology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?