MR Elastography for Classification of Focal Liver Lesions Using Viscoelastic Parameters: A Pilot Study Based on Intrinsic and Extrinsic Activations

Amirhosein Baradaran Najar,Guillaume Gilbert,Elige Karam,Anton Volniansky,Audrey Fohlen,Maxime Barat,Emmanuel Montagnon,Hélène Castel,Jeanne‐Marie Giard,Bich N. Nguyen,Guy Cloutier,An Tang,Elijah Van Houten
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.29633
IF: 4.4
2024-10-26
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Abstract:Background Intrinsic activation MR elastography (iMRE) uses cardiovascular pulsations to assess tissue viscoelastic properties. Applying it to focal liver lesions extends its capabilities. Purpose To assess the viscoelastic parameters of focal liver lesions measured by iMRE and compare its diagnostic performance with extrinsic MRE (eMRE) for differentiating malignant and benign lesions. Study type Prospective. Population A total of 55 participants underwent MRI with research MRE sequences; 32 participants with 17 malignant and 15 benign lesions underwent both iMRE and eMRE. Field Strength/Sequence iMRE at ~1 Hz heart rate used a 3 T scanner with a modified four‐dimensional (4D)‐quantitative flow gradient‐echo phase contrast and low‐velocity encoding cardiac‐triggered technique. eMRE employed a gradient‐echo sequence at 30, 40, and 60 Hz. Assessment Liver displacements were measured using 4D‐phase contrast and reconstructed via a nonlinear inversion algorithm to determine shear stiffness (SS) and damping ratio (DR). iMRE parameters were normalized to the corresponding values from the spleen. Lesions were manually segmented, and image quality was reviewed. Statistical Tests Kruskal–Wallis, Mann–Whitney, Dunn's test, and areas under receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC) were assessed. Results SS was significantly higher in malignant than benign lesions with iMRE at 1 Hz (3.69 ± 1.31 vs. 1.63 ± 0.45) and eMRE at 30 Hz (3.76 ± 1.12 vs. 2.60 ± 1.26 kPa), 40 Hz (3.76 ± 1.12 vs. 2.60 ± 1.26 kPa), and 60 Hz (7.32 ± 2.87 vs. 2.48 ± 1.12 kPa). DR was also significantly higher in malignant than benign lesions at 40 Hz (0.36 ± 0.11 vs. 0.21 ± 0.01) and 60 Hz (0.89 ± 0.86 vs. 0.22 ± 0.09). The AUC were 0.86 for iMRE SS, 0.87–0.98 for eMRE SS, 0.47 for iMRE DR, and 0.62–0.86 for eMRE DR. Data Conclusion Cardiac‐activated iMRE can characterize liver lesions and differentiate malignant from benign lesions through normalized SS maps. Level of Evidence 2 Technical Efficacy Stage 2
radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging
What problem does this paper attempt to address?