Three‐Dimensional Multifrequency MR Elastography for Microvascular Invasion and Prognosis Assessment in Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Guixue Liu,Zhehan Shen,Huanhuan Chong,Jiahao Zhou,Tianyi Zhang,Yikun Wang,Di Ma,Yuchen Yang,Yongjun Chen,Huafeng Wang,Ingolf Sack,Jing Guo,Ruokun Li,Fuhua Yan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.29276
IF: 4.4
2024-02-13
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Abstract:Background Pretreatment identification of microvascular invasion (MVI) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is important when selecting treatment strategies. Purpose To improve models for predicting MVI and recurrence‐free survival (RFS) by developing nomograms containing three‐dimensional (3D) MR elastography (MRE). Study Type Prospective. Population 188 patients with HCC, divided into a training cohort (n = 150) and a validation cohort (n = 38). In the training cohort, 106/150 patients completed a 2‐year follow‐up. Field Strength/Sequence 1.5T 3D multifrequency MRE with a single‐shot spin‐echo echo planar imaging sequence, and 3.0T multiparametric MRI (mp‐MRI), consisting of diffusion‐weighted echo planar imaging, T2‐weighted fast spin echo, in‐phase out‐of‐phase T1‐weighted fast spoiled gradient‐recalled dual‐echo and dynamic contrast‐enhanced gradient echo sequences. Assessment Multivariable analysis was used to identify the independent predictors for MVI and RFS. Nomograms were constructed for visualization. Models for predicting MVI and RFS were built using mp‐MRI parameters and a combination of mp‐MRI and 3D MRE predictors. Statistical Tests Student's t‐test, Mann–Whitney U test, chi‐squared or Fisher's exact tests, multivariable analysis, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), DeLong test, Kaplan–Meier analysis and log rank tests. P 40 months). The MVI predicted by the 3D MRE model yielded similar results (26.9 months vs. >40 months). The MVI and RFS nomograms of the histologic‐MVI and model‐predicted MVI‐positive showed good predictive performance. Data Conclusion Biomechanical properties of 3D MRE were biomarkers for MVI and RFS. MVI and RFS nomograms were established. Level of Evidence 2 Technical Efficacy Stage 2
radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging
What problem does this paper attempt to address?