Abstract:The wildlife management institution has been transforming to ensure relevance and positive conservation outcomes into the future. Continuous improvement of decision making is one aspect of this transformation. Managers and policy makers with responsibility for wildlife decisions have an exceedingly challenging job because the set of objectives they wish to achieve is so complex, multifaceted, and often contentious. Many wildlife management agencies desire decision‐making processes that are transparent, replicable, engage partners, and communicate effectively with the public. Using a decision science approach offers a framework to allow agencies to achieve these objectives so the decision‐making process is consistent with their desires. One can point to many excellent examples of formal decision science applications by state and federal agencies in the United States, but many obstacles hinder systematic approaches to decision making. We describe our observations—based on first‐hand experiences—with decision making in wildlife management, present reasons why making decisions is difficult, identify challenges faced by wildlife managers at various levels of governance, and address measures wildlife managers can employ to help overcome these challenges. We acknowledge that no panacea, simple recipe, or one‐size‐fits‐all prescription exists for wildlife management decision making. Nevertheless, we hope that by a) describing how a systematic decision science framework can help agencies achieve their objectives, while simultaneously benefiting stakeholders, managers, and conservation outcomes, and b) providing specific suggestions for overcoming challenges associated with decision making, we will help agencies in the midst of their challenges to improve decision‐making processes consistent with their objectives. © 2020 The Authors. Wildlife Society Bulletin published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of The Wildlife Society. We present reasons why decision making in wildlife management is difficult, identify challenges faced by wildlife managers at various levels of governance, and address measures wildlife managers can employ to help overcome these challenges. One fundamental change needed in decision making for complex problems that exist at the intersection of ecological, social, and economic spheres is widespread recognition that an explicit framework is useful to arrive at defensible and robust decisions.

Biological mechanisms matter in contemporary wildlife conservation

Leveraging the value of conservation physiology for ecological restoration

Reframing conservation physiology to be more inclusive, integrative, relevant and forward-looking: reflections and a horizon scan

Expanding Conservation Science through Emerging Interdisciplinary STEM Fields

Ratcheting up Rigor in Wildlife Management Decision Making

Using animal behavior in conservation management: a series of systematic reviews and maps

Striving for population-level conservation: integrating physiology across the biological hierarchy

One hundred research questions in conservation physiology for generating actionable evidence to inform conservation policy and practice

Mechanistic forecasts of species responses to climate change: The promise of biophysical ecology

Opening the black box between governance and management: A mechanism-based explanation of how governance affects the management of endangered species

Towards Mechanistic Integration of the Causes and Consequences of Biodiversity

Conservation Tools: The Next Generation of Engineering--Biology Collaborations

Merging paleobiology with conservation biology to guide the future of terrestrial ecosystems

The scientific basis of practical conservation: factors limiting the persistence of populations and communities of animals and plants

Integrating behaviour and ecology into global biodiversity conservation strategies

Integrating biogeography and behavioral ecology to rapidly address biodiversity loss

Population and community consequences of perceived risk from humans in wildlife

A Neglected Science: Applying Behavior to Aquatic Conservation

Evaluating unintended consequences of intentional species introductions and eradications for improved conservation management

Population Genomics for the Management of Wild Vertebrate Populations

Wildlife Conservation on Private Land: A Social-Ecological Systems Study