Abstract:We have shown that three emerging conservation technologies, passive acoustic monitoring, machine learning animal sound identification algorithms, and advances in Bayesian statistical tools, can provide previously unattainable information about biodiversity responses to ecological change. Critically, our approach is transferrable and scalable, as the workflow is agnostic to species or ecosystem and each component is either freely available (all relevant software) or relatively inexpensive (recording hardware). Environmental change is unfolding rapidly, but new analytical techniques may help our understanding and—thus interventions—keep pace. Ecological disturbances are becoming more extensive and intensive globally, a trend exemplified by 'megafires' and industrial deforestation, which cause widespread losses of forest cover. Yet the hypothesis that contemporary environmental disturbances are affecting biodiversity has been difficult to test directly. The novel combination of landscape‐scale passive acoustic monitoring, a new machine learning algorithm, BirdNET and improved Bayesian model‐fitting engines enables cohesive, community‐level before‐after, control‐impact studies of disturbances. We conducted such a study of a 2020 megafire in the Sierra Nevada, USA. We used a bespoke dynamic multi‐species occupancy modelling approach, which enabled us to account for imperfect detection, misclassifications, and to share information among species. There was no community‐level difference in colonization between burned and unburned forest. In contrast, the probability of site extinction in burned forest, 0.36, was significantly higher than in unburned forest, 0.12. Of the 67 species in our study, 6 (9%) displayed a positive colonization response to the fire, while 28 (41%) displayed a significant extinction response. We observed a 12% decrease in avian biodiversity 1 year post‐fire, and a substantial shift in community composition. However, in this ecosystem, many species display time‐dependent responses to the fire that are unobservable after just 1 year. Synthesis and applications. We have shown that three emerging conservation technologies, passive acoustic monitoring, machine learning animal sound identification algorithms, and advances in Bayesian statistical tools, can provide previously unattainable information about biodiversity responses to ecological change. Critically, our approach is transferrable and scalable, as the workflow is agnostic to species or ecosystem and each component is either freely available (all relevant software) or relatively inexpensive (recording hardware). Environmental change is unfolding rapidly, but new analytical techniques may help our understanding and—thus interventions—keep pace.

Wildlife Conservation on Private Land: A Social-Ecological Systems Study

Urban wildlife ecology and conservation:A brief history of the discipline

From tweets to tings: Dissimilarity in recorded species community between social media platforms and implications for resource-limited conservation

A scalable and transferable approach to combining emerging conservation technologies to identify biodiversity change after large disturbances

A local ecological knowledge-based assessment of anthropodependence for large mammals in anthropogenic landscapes

Unpacking the challenges of wildlife governance in community‐based conservation programs to promote human–wildlife coexistence

Mapping Indigenous land management for threatened species conservation: An Australian case-study

Evaluating Contributions of Recent Tracking-Based Animal Movement Ecology to Conservation Management

Conserving tropical biodiversity via market forces and spatial targeting

Conservation through connection: Approaches to engaging communities in applied grizzly bear research

The human side of rewilding: Attitudes towards multi-species restoration at the public-private land nexus

An audacious approach to conservation

The long shadow of woody encroachment: An integrated approach to modeling grassland songbird habitat

Birds on the edge: Spatial and temporal patterns in the bird community recorded at a conservation reserve on a bioregion woodland−grassland boundary in central Queensland

Managing biodiversity on private land: Directions for collaboration through reconciliation ecology

Motivations and fears driving participation in collaborative research infrastructure for animal tracking

Land Sharing and Land Sparing Reveal Social and Ecological Synergy in Big Cat Conservation

Use of wildlife-friendly structures in residential gardens by animal wildlife: evidence from citizen scientists in a global biodiversity hotspot

Activity of free-roaming domestic cats in an urban reserve and public perception of pet-related threats to wildlife in New Zealand

Conserving urban biodiversity: Current practice, barriers, and enablers

Transparency and adaptability aid in realigning the complexity of objectives, approaches, and systems in human-wildlife coexistence research