Abstract:Background: Humeral head defects such as degenerative disease or avascular necrosis are often treated with stemmed hemiarthroplasty or total shoulder arthroplasty. Despite its historical and clinical significance, stemmed humeral head replacement poses inherent technical challenges to placing spherical implants at the anatomically correct head height, version, and neck-shaft angle. Purpose: The aim of this study was to assess humeral head inlay arthroplasty as a joint-preserving alternative that maintains the individual head-neck-shaft anatomy. Humeral head inlay arthroplasty also allows intraoperative surface mapping and placement of a contoured articular component that is matched to the patient’s defect size, location, and individual surface geometry. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: This retrospective case series included 19 patients (20 shoulders), with an average age of 48.9 years (range, 32-58 years; 16 men, 3 women). Preoperative diagnoses were osteoarthritis in 16 shoulders and osteonecrosis in 4 shoulders. Pre- and postoperative evaluations included physical examination, radiographic assessment, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form, the Simple Shoulder Test, a pain visual analog scale, and patient satisfaction rating. Results: The mean follow-up period was 32.7 months (range, 17-66 months). The mean American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score improved from 24.1 to 78.8, mean Simple Shoulder Test score from 3.95 to 9.3, mean visual analog scale score from 8.2 to 2.1, mean forward flexion from 100° to 129°, and mean external rotation from 23° to 43° ( P < .001 for all). Radiographic follow-up showed no evidence of periprosthetic fracture, component loosening, osteolysis, or device failure. Patient shoulder self-assessment was 90% poor before surgery and improved to 75% good to excellent at last follow-up; 20% of patients self-rated as somewhat good to somewhat poor, and 5% self-rated as poor. Ninety percent of patients were satisfied with the choice of the procedure. Three patients had postoperative complications unrelated to the implants, including a partial rotator cuff tear treated with physical therapy, preexisting glenoid wear treated with arthroscopic debridement and microfracture, and infection complicated by subscapularis rupture requiring several subsequent surgical procedures but with retention of the implant. Conclusion: Humeral head inlay arthroplasty is effective in providing pain relief, functional improvement, and patient satisfaction. Rather than delaying shoulder arthroplasty to end-stage osteoarthritis, humeral head inlay arthroplasty is a promising new direction in primary shoulder arthroplasty for younger and active patients with earlier stage disease.

Elliptical and spherical heads show similar obligate glenohumeral translation during axial rotation in total shoulder arthroplasty

The sizing and suitability of nonspherical ellipsoid humeral heads for total shoulder arthroplasty

Impact of humeral and glenoid component variations on range of motion in reverse geometry total shoulder arthroplasty: a standardized computer model study

A gender and size specific evaluation of Grammont-type inlay versus lateralizing onlay stem designs in achieving lateralization and distalization in reverse shoulder arthroplasty

Varus-valgus Alignment of Humeral Short Stem in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: Does It Really Matter?

Finite element analysis part 1 of 2: Influence of short stem implant polyethylene configuration on glenohumeral joint biomechanics

Head-Shaft Angle Influences Isometric Shoulder Strength Levels after Intramedullary Nailing of Proximal Humerus Fractures: A Pilot Study

Optimizing stability and motion in reverse shoulder arthroplasty with a 135° neck-shaft-angle: a computer model study of standard versus retentive humeral inserts

Global diversity in bearings in primary THA

Position of the Prosthesis and the Incidence of Dislocation Following Total Hip Replacement

Eccentricity and greater size of the glenosphere increase impingement-free range of motion in glenoid lateralized reverse shoulder arthroplasty: A computational study

Surgical Parameters During Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Predict Post-Surgical Kinematics During the Hand-to-Head Motion

Different fixation methods for artificial femoral head replacement: A biomechanical comparison of joint stability

Finite element analysis part 2 of 2: Glenohumeral bone stress distribution depends on implant configuration for anatomic and reverse stemless shoulder implants

Humeral stem alignment of curved short stem in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: varus/valgus alignment is not a determinant for clinical outcomes

Influence of glenosphere design and material on clinical outcomes of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty

Finite Element Analysis of Influence of Axial Position of Center of Rotation of a Cervical Total Disc Replacement on Biomechanical Parameters: Simulated 2-Level Replacement Based on a Validated Model.

Primary Partial Humeral Head Resurfacing

Modification of Humeral Component Results in Increased Impingement Free Range of Motion in a Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Model

Is preoperative planning reliable for predicting postoperative clinical differences in range of motion between two stem designs in reverse shoulder arthroplasty

Contact Mechanics of Non-Spherical Hip Joint Replacements