Assessing Facial Palsy: Does Feedback Improve Assessment Using the eFACE and Sunnybrook Facial Grading System?

Tessa E. Bruins,Romy F. Lammens,Martinus M. van Veen,Katalin Tamási,Pieter U. Dijkstra,Paul M.N. Werker,Dieuwke C. Broekstra
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.31269
IF: 2.97
2024-01-14
The Laryngoscope
Abstract:Several assessment instruments for grading facial function are available, of which the eFACE and the Sunnybrook Facial Grading System (Sunnybrook) are commonly used. Currently, it is unknown how much training users should receive before being able to adequately assess facial palsy using these two instruments. In this study it was found that the eFACE was easier to learn than the Sunnybrook. Objective(s) To explore learning effects when applying the clinician‐graded electronic facial function scale (eFACE) and the Sunnybrook Facial Grading System (Sunnybrook). Methods Surgeons, facial rehabilitation therapists, and medical students were randomly allocated to the eFACE (n = 7) or Sunnybrook (n = 6) and graded 60 videos (Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary open‐source standard set); 10 persons with normal facial function and 50 patients with a wide variation of facial palsy severity. Participants received an introduction and individual feedback after each set of 10 videos. Scores were compared to the reference score provided with the set. Multilevel analysis was performed to analyze learning effect. Results A learning effect was only found for the eFACE, with significant difference scores in set 1 and 2 compared to set 6, and no significant difference scores in the following sets. The difference score was associated with the reference score (severity of facial palsy) for eFACE (β = −0.19; SE = 0.04; p
medicine, research & experimental,otorhinolaryngology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?