Evaluation of a New Assessment Method of the Severity of Peripheral Facial Palsy

郭起浩,吴平,洪震,吕传真
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1009-6574.2006.05.001
2006-01-01
Abstract:Objective To develop a new assessment method of the severity of peripheral facial palsy, and to evaluate its reliability and validity in baseline of Bell’s pasly and Hunt syndrome. Methods 115 consecutive patients presenting with peripheral facial palsy visiting the department of Neurology in Huashan Hospital were included. The facial palsy was assessed with the House-Brackmann, Yanagihara and Sunnybrook facial grading systems(HBGS, YFGS and SFGS) and a new assessment method-Huashan facial grading systems(HFGS). HFGS assesses the function of the branches in the facial canal and the temporal, zygomatic, buccal branches, marginal madibular, and cervical branch. Results (1) HFGS had good reliability and was superior to HBGS, YFGS and SFGS. (2) The scores of the temporal, zygomatic, buccal branches and the marginal madibular branch in HFGS had significant correlation with scores of HBGS, YFGS and SFGS. (3) comparing HFGS scores of Group moderate, moderately severe and severe degree according to HBGS, there was significant difference among the three groups as to the scores of the temporal, zygomatic, buccal branches and the marginal madibular branch and the total HFGS score rather than those of the branches in the facial canal and the cervical branch. (4) The cervical branch was got the best recovery in follow-up research. Conclusions The involvement levels were different in different branches of the facial nerve. The buccal branches could represent the total severity most. The cervical branch was the least involved one and got the best recovery. HFGS had good reliability and validity.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?