Endovascular Recanalization for Nonacute Intracranial Vertebral Artery Occlusion According to a New Classification.

Feng Gao,Xuan Sun,Huijun Zhang,Ning Ma,Dapeng Mo,Zhongrong Miao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/strokeaha.120.030440
IF: 10.17
2020-08-27
Stroke
Abstract:Endovascular recanalization for patients with nonacute intracranial vertebral artery occlusion remains clinically challenging. We aim to evaluate the feasibility and safety of endovascular recanalization for nonacute intracranial vertebral artery occlusion and propose a new angiographic classification. Fifty patients with symptomatic atherosclerotic nonacute intracranial vertebral artery occlusion from January 2015 to December 2019 were analyzed, retrospectively. The rate of recanalization, peri-procedural complications, and follow-up results were evaluated. All patients were divided into 4 groups according to an angiographic classification. Among the 50 patients, 38 (76%) achieved successful recanalization. Any stroke or death within 30 days was 4% (2/50). From type I to type IV, the recanalization rate gradually decreased (94.1%, 76.9%, 70%, and 50%, respectively, P =0.012), while the perioperative complication rate gradually increased (0.0%, 7.7%, 20%, and 50%, respectively, P =0.001). Endovascular recanalization may be feasible and safe for carefully selected patients with symptomatic atherosclerotic nonacute intracranial vertebral artery occlusion and, therefore, represents an alternative treatment, especially for type I and type II patients.
peripheral vascular disease,clinical neurology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The paper attempts to address the feasibility and safety of endovascular recanalization (ER) treatment for patients with Nonacute Intracranial Vertebral Artery Occlusion (NA-ICVAO). Specifically, the authors aim to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of this treatment method and propose a new angiographic classification to guide individualized risk stratification and patient selection. ### Background and Objectives Patients with nonacute intracranial vertebral artery occlusion have a high risk of recurrent ischemic stroke despite optimal medical treatment. Currently, the optimal treatment method for these patients is unclear. Some case series studies have shown that endovascular recanalization (ER) is feasible in this context, but the heterogeneity of perioperative outcomes and the high incidence of complications have prompted researchers to explore which patients are most suitable for this treatment and to conduct individualized risk stratification. ### Methods The study retrospectively analyzed 50 patients with symptomatic atherosclerotic nonacute intracranial vertebral artery occlusion from January 2015 to December 2019. All patients were divided into 4 groups based on the new angiographic classification: - **Type I**: Occlusion length ≤15 mm - **Type II**: Occlusion length >15 mm - **Type III**: Occlusion length >15 mm and the tortuosity angle of the occluded segment ≥45° - **Type IV**: Occlusion extends to the extradural segment ### Results - **Recanalization Rate**: 38 out of 50 patients (76%) successfully achieved recanalization. - **Perioperative Complications**: The rate of any stroke or death within 30 days was 4% (2/50). - **Recanalization and Complication Rates by Type**: - Type I: Recanalization rate was 94.1%, perioperative complication rate was 0% - Type II: Recanalization rate was 76.9%, perioperative complication rate was 7.7% - Type III: Recanalization rate was 70%, perioperative complication rate was 20% - Type IV: Recanalization rate was 50%, perioperative complication rate was 50% ### Conclusion For carefully selected patients with symptomatic atherosclerotic nonacute intracranial vertebral artery occlusion, endovascular recanalization may be feasible and safe, especially for Type I and Type II patients. This provides a reference for patient selection and risk stratification.