Effects and safety of endovascular recanalization for non-acute symptomatic intracranial vertebral artery occlusion with different risks

Shunqiang Chen,Jinchao Xia,Shuxin Xiao,Tianxiao Li,Ziliang Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000036813
IF: 1.6
2024-02-17
Medicine
Abstract:Acute intracranial vertebral artery (ICVA) occlusion is associated with high mortality and morbidity, current randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses of observational studies recommend endovascular recanalization for acute vertebral artery occlusion. [ 1 ] However, some patients with ICVA occlusion survive the acute stage of arterial occlusion and enter non-acute stage. Although these patients survive the acute stage and receive aggressive clinical management, Some patients with hemodynamic damage or extension of the occlusive lesions present with progressive or recurrent symptoms. [ 2 , 3 ] Some patients experience recurrent symptoms; repeated infarctions of the brain stem and cerebellum can lead to catastrophic results, especially in those with hemodynamic instability or occlusive progressions. [ 4–6 ] There is no consensus on the optimal management of patients with non-acute ICVA occlusion. A surgical bypass procedure for this condition has been described previously; however, the bypass procedure is technically challenging and confers a greater risk for complications than anterior circulation. [ 7 , 8 ] A few small case series suggest that endovascular recanalization may be a viable treatment option for patients with non-acute symptomatic ICVA occlusion and that the success rate of endovascular recanalization and perioperative complications are influenced by occlusion length, duration, nature, calcification, angulation, and etiology. [ 6 , 9–12 ]
medicine, general & internal
What problem does this paper attempt to address?