Effect of treatment frequency on the efficacy of superhydrophobic antimicrobial photodynamic therapy of periodontitis in a wistar rat model

Caroline Coradi Tonon,Alessandra Nara de Souza Rastelli,Chathuna Bodahandi,Shoaib Ashraf,Tayyaba Hasan,QianFeng Xu,Alexander Greer,Alan M. Lyons

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/php.14021

2024-10-12

Photochemistry and Photobiology

Abstract:Superhydrophobic antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (SH‐aPDT) generates singlet oxygen (1O2) from a fiber optic device tip that kills periodontal biofilms. Here we evaluate three treatment protocols: single treatment; interval treatments (days 0, 2, and 7); and consecutive treatments (days 0, 1, and 2) using an in vivo Wistar rat periodontitis model. Superhydrophobic antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (SH‐aPDT) is advantageous wherein airborne singlet oxygen (1O2) is delivered from a device tip to kill a biofilm with no photosensitizer exposure and no bacterial selectivity (Gram + or Gram −). For effective treatment of periodontitis, the frequency of treatment as well as the optical light fluence required is not known. Thus, we sought to determine whether single or repeated SH‐aPDT treatments would work best in vivo using two fluence values: 60 and 125 J/cm2. We assessed the efficacy of three protocols: single treatment; interval treatments (days 0, 2, and 7); and consecutive treatments (days 0, 1, and 2). After 30 days of evaluation, we found that, SH‐aPDT in 3 consecutive treatments significantly decreased Porphyromonas gingivalis levels compared to single and interval SH‐aPDT treatments, as well as SRP‐chlorhexidine (CHX) controls (p

biochemistry & molecular biology,biophysics