Clinical efficacy of ozonated water and photodynamic therapy in non-surgical management of chronic periodontitis: A clinico- microbial study

Roopanshi Mehrotra,Sanjay Gupta,Zeba Rahman Siddiqui,Deepti Chandra,Sk Aziz Ikbal

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdpdt.2023.103749

Abstract:Background: Periodontitis is a chronic multifactorial inflammatory disease associated with dysbiotic plaque biofilms and characterized by progressive destruction of the tooth-supporting apparatus. Treatment of the periodontitis is a key challenge since the disease occurs due to microbial biofilm which is extremely resistant to host response and antimicrobials. Among non-surgical methods, scaling and root planning (SRP) is considered as the fundamental method and results in the utmost improvements. However, complete elimination of subgingival calculus is difficult. A substitute treatment in inhibition of subgingival microbiota can be attained by ozonated water at a concentration of 0.5-4 mg/L. Lately, laser light therapy has been proposed in periodontal therapy in an endeavor to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of bacterial elimination and root surface debridement. Materials and methods: 26 patients with chronic periodontitis were selected. The selected arches were randomly divided into two groups: Group-A was subjected to SRP + Ozone-Therapy and Group-B to SRP + Photodynamic-Therapy. Clinical parameters were recorded at baseline, 1&2months. Microbial parameters were recorded at baseline and 2-months. Results: For both the groups significant decrease in clinical parameters were seen from baseline to 1 month and further in 2 months. On intergroup comparison of clinical parameters no significant result was found. Both the groups showed significant decrease in microbial parameters was seen from baseline to 2 months. On intergroup comparison of microbial parameters no significant result was found. Conclusion: Clinically and microbiologically, there was significant difference in both the groups between all time periods (P < 0.001), however there was no significant difference between the two groups at all periods (P > 0.05).