Abstract:Purpose: To compare the outcome of implants inserted in maxillary sinuses augmented with anorganic bovine bone (ABB) grafts vs mixed 50% ABB and 50% autologous bone graft, using a lateral window approach. Materials and methods: This study was designed as a randomised controlled trial of parallel groups. Patients in need of an implant-supported prosthesis in a maxillary posterior area with a residual alveolar bone height no greater than 4 mm (range 0-4 mm) were recruited for lateral sinus grafting. Patients were randomly allocated to receive 50% ABB and 50% autogenous bone (group A) or 100% ABB (group B). After 7 months, tapered implants were inserted with an insertion torque between 20 and 45 Ncm. After 3 months, implants were loaded with screw-retained temporary crowns. Definitive crowns were delivered 3 months later. Outcome measures were implant survival, complications, radiographic marginal bone-level changes, probing pocket depths (PPD) and bleeding on probing (BOP). Clinical data were collected at definitive prosthesis delivery, 1 and 2 years after loading. Results: Thirty-two consecutive patients were treated with 32 sinus lift procedures (16 group A, 16 group B). A total of 46 implants were installed. No patient dropped out. No crown/implant failed by the end of the study. Three complications (one sinus membrane perforation and two chipping of the ceramic) were observed in three patients in group A, vs none in group B (RR 0.81; 95% CI 0.64 - 1.03 mm; P = 0.225). At the 2-year after final loading follow-up, the mean marginal bone loss was 1.18 ± 0.50 mm (95% CI 0.95 - 1.45 mm) in group A and 1.28 ± 0.48 mm (95% CI 0.97 - 1.43 mm) in group B, with no statistically significant differences between the two groups (difference 0.11 ± 0.22 mm; 95% CI -0.06 - 0.16 mm; P = 0.586). At the same follow-up, the mean PPD value was 2.70 ± 0.39 for group A and 2.54 ± 0.66 for group B, with no statistically significant difference between groups (difference 0.17 ± 0.39 mm; 95% CI 0.06 - 0.32 mm; P = 0.456), while the mean BOP value was 1.21 ± 0.79 for group A and 1.28 ± 0.68 for group B, (difference: 0.06 ± 0.49 mm; 95% CI -0.23 - 0.25 mm; P = 0.297). Conclusions: Within the limitations of this study, the present data seem to confirm the hypothesis that the clinical outcome of implants inserted in sinuses grafted with ABB vs implants inserted in sinuses grafted with mixed 50% ABB and 50% autologous bone are comparable. Conflict-of-interest statement: This study was not supported by any company. All the authors declare no conflict of interest.

A graftless maxillary sinus lifting approach with simultaneous dental implant placement: a prospective clinical study

Clinical and Patient-Centered Outcomes Following Rehabilitation of Atrophic Edentulous Maxilla Using Six Implants Placed Simultaneously with Bilateral Maxillary Sinus Augmentation: A Retrospective Case Series.

Comparative Evaluation of Endo-sinus Bone Augmentation after Osteotome Sinus Floor Elevation Without Grafting Using Two Radiographic Methods.

Immediate Implant Placement in Conjunction with Maxillary Sinus Lifting and Grafting

Minimally invasive maxillary sinus lift techniques via crestal approach with dental implants placement simultaneously

A Novel Dental Implant Approach for Crestal Sinus Elevation: A Case Series Study

Modified Maxillary Sinus Floor Elevation Via A Mini-Lateral Window With Simultaneous Placement Of Dental Implants: A Clinical And Radiographical Study

Closed sinus lift and fixed prostheses versus implant-assisted overdentures in management of atrophied distal extension maxillary ridges: A one-year randomized clinical trial

Crestal approach for maxillary sinus augmentation in individuals with limited alveolar bone height: An observational study

[Clinical Study of Simultaneous Implantation in Maxillary Molar Area after Bone Graft in Patients with Residual Alveolar Bone Height<3 Mm].

Clinical Outcomes of Implants Placed with Transcrestal Maxillary Sinus Elevation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

[Retrospective Analysis of Maxillary Sinus Augmentation for Endosseous Implants].

Comparative evaluation of hard and soft tissue parameters by using short implants and standard long implants with sinus lift for prosthetic rehabilitation of posterior maxilla

A clinical long-term evaluation of implants in atrophic posterior maxilla utilizing the sinus floor augmentation technique

Assessment of the autogenous bone graft for sinus elevation

[Clinical Application of Implant-Supported Rehabilitation with Osteotome Sinus Floor Elevation Without Bone Grafting and Simultaneous Implant Placement].

Sinus lift grafting with anorganic bovine bone vs 50% autologous bone mixed with 50% anorganic bovine bone: 2 years after loading results from a randomised controlled trial

Maxillary sinus lift to enable one stage implant placement using Nanobone & PRF with or without simvastatin.

Restoratively driven planning for implants in the posterior maxilla - Part 1: alveolar bone healing, bone assessment and clinical classifications

A three-in-one alveolar process reconstruction protocol for maxillary molar sites with severe residual bone height deficiency: A proof-of-concept pilot study

Transalveolar Sinus Floor Elevation Using Osteotomes Without Grafting in Severely Atrophic Maxilla: a 5-Year Prospective Study.