A framework for reasoning in school mathematics: analyzing the development of mathematical claims

Anita Valenta,Kirsti Rø,Sigrid Iversen Klock

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-024-10309-5

2024-03-21

Educational Studies in Mathematics

Abstract:This study introduces a framework for analyzing opportunities for mathematical reasoning (MR) in school mathematics, using MR-relevant claims and their derivation as the unit of analysis. We contend that this approach can effectively capture a broad range of opportunities for MR across various teaching situations. The framework, rooted in commognition, entails identifying necessary object-level narratives (NOLs) and the processes involved in their construction and substantiation. After theoretical development, the framework was refined through analyses of mathematics lessons in Norwegian primary school classrooms. Examples from the data illustrate how to utilize the framework in analysis and what such analyses can reveal in four typical teaching situations: the introduction of new mathematical objects, the introduction of procedures, work on exercise tasks, and work on problem-solving tasks. Drawing from the analysis of these examples, we discuss the value of the framework for analyzing MR in school mathematics and how such analysis can benefit teachers and researchers.

education & educational research

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The main objective of this paper is to propose an analytical framework for studying opportunities for Mathematical Reasoning (MR) in school mathematics teaching. Specifically, the framework focuses on claims related to mathematical reasoning that arise in mathematics classrooms and their derivation processes.

The paper first defines mathematical reasoning and emphasizes its importance in the curricula of different countries. However, despite being considered a core part of the mathematics discipline, how to effectively integrate it into school mathematics teaching remains unclear. Therefore, the authors believe it is necessary to study the opportunities for mathematical reasoning in various teaching contexts.

To achieve this goal, the authors developed an analytical framework based on commognition theory. This framework primarily focuses on identifying necessary object-level narratives (NOLs) and the processes of constructing and validating these narratives. The authors further subdivide NOLs into three types: single cases, multiple but finite cases, and infinite or general cases. This helps in understanding how different types of mathematical claims are constructed and validated in the classroom.

The paper also explores the different types of processes involved in the construction and validation of NOLs, including the use of procedures and the use of properties and relations. By distinguishing these processes, a better understanding of the opportunities for mathematical reasoning can be achieved.

To validate and refine this framework, the authors analyzed data from Norwegian primary school classrooms. These analyses revealed opportunities for mathematical reasoning in four typical teaching situations: introducing new mathematical objects, introducing procedures, working on practice problems, and working on problem-solving tasks. Through the analysis of these examples, the authors discuss the value of the framework for analyzing mathematical reasoning in school mathematics and how such analysis can help teachers and researchers.

In summary, the paper aims to address the issue of how to identify and develop opportunities for mathematical reasoning in school mathematics teaching and to promote this goal by introducing a new analytical framework.