Abstract:Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: Foundation. Main funding source(s): the National Natural Science Foundation of China onbehalf Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital,Zhejiang University,School of Medicine Background Left atrial (LA) and appendage (LAA) dysfunction were associated with increased risk of stroke in atrial fibrillation. However, usefulness of LA and LAA mechanics has not been fully compared. Methods:201 AF patients were prospectively enrolled. 42(20.8%) had previous stroke/TIA. Speckle tracking was used to measure LA and LAA peak postive strain. LA and LAA MD was defined as the SD of time to peak positive strain corrected by the R-R interval. Results:LA MD and LAA MD were independently associated with stroke/TIA. The model based on CHA2DS2-VASc score for discrimination of stroke was significantly improved by adding LA MD or LAA MD (P < 0.01). Diagnostic value of LA MD was better than LAA MD in patients with normal LA volumes, while LAA MD was more useful in patients with LA enlargement.Conclusion:Both LA and LAA mechanics had incremental value over CHA2DS2VASc score. However, priorities of strain assessment depend on patients’ LA volume. Variables Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 OR (95% CI) P value OR (95% CI) P value OR (95% CI) p value OR (95% CI) P value Clinical parameters Age 1.09(1.04-1.14) <0.001 1.11(1.04-1.17) 0.001 1.11(1.05-1.17) 0.001 1.11(1.04-1.17) 0.001 BMI 0.988(0.89-1.10) 0.84 1.07(0.92-1.25) 0.40 1.07(0.91-1.25) 0.40 CHA2DS2-VASc score 1.52(1.15-2.00) 0.003 1.08(0.67-1.74) 0.76 1.08(0.65-1.80) 0.77 1.10(0.69-1.76) 0.69 Persistent AF 1.88(0.94-3.74) 0.07 0.75(0.23-2.40) 0.63 0.87(0.27-2.81) 0.82 Therapeutic anticoagulation 0.56(0.28-1.11) 0.10 0.22(0.09-0.57) 0.002 0.23(0.09-0.59) 0.002 0.22(0.09-0.57) 0.002 LA parameters LAEF 0.96(0.94-0.99) 0.002 0.982(0.953-1.01) 0.26 iLAVmin 1.03(1.01-1.05) 0.006 0.98(0.94-1.02) 0.27 LA MD 1.22(1.10-1.36) <0.001 1.16(1.02-1.32) 0.02 1.18(1.03-1.34) 0.02 1.16(1.02-1.32) 0.02 LA GLS 0.935(0.893-0.98) 0.005 1.0(0.953-1.14) 0.36 1.02(0.94-1.12) 0.59 1.02(0.94-1.10) 0.72 LAA parameters LAAEV 0.12(0.02-0.74) 0.02 3.34(0.31-36.06) 0.32 LAA EF 0.98(0.96-1.00) 0.06 1.01(0.98-1.04) 0.65 LAA GLS 0.85(0.77-0.94) 0.001 0.96(0.86-1.07) 0.46 0.97(0.87-1.08) 0.59 0.96(0.87-1.06) 0.44 LAA dense SEC/thrombus 3.12(1.39-6.99) 0.006 2.02(0.75-5.45) 0.167 LAA MD 1.19(1.09-1.29) <0.001 1.19(1.08-1.31) 0.001 1.19(1.08-1.31) 0.001 1.19(1.08-1.31) 0.001 Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses of associations between clinical and echocardiographic covariates with stroke Abstract Figure.

Computational modeling of hemodynamics and risk of thrombosis in the left atrial appendage using patient-specific blood viscosity and boundary conditions at the mitral valve

Comparison of Left Atrial and Atrial Appendage Mechanics to Stratify the Risk of Left Atrial/atrial Appendage Stasis in Patients with Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation

Comparison of Left Atrial and Left Atrial Appendage Mechanics in the Risk Stratification of Stroke in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation

The assessment of left atrial and left atrial appendage mechanics in patients with different stages of atrial fibrillation

Research on the Internal Flow Field of Left Atrial Appendage and Stroke Risk Assessment with Different Blood Models

Hemodynamic differences caused by left atrial appendage modeling contours

Fluid-structure interaction analysis of the thromboembolic risk in the left atrial appendage under atrial fibrillation: effect of hemodynamics and morphological features

Patient-specific pulmonary venous flow characterization and its impact on left atrial appendage thrombosis in atrial fibrillation patients

Numerical prediction of thrombosis risk in left atrium under atrial fibrillation

Numerical study of the risk of thrombosis in the left atrial appendage of chicken wing shape in atrial fibrillation

Demonstration of Patient-Specific Simulations to Assess Left Atrial Appendage Thrombogenesis Risk

Computational Fluid Dynamic Analysis of the Left Atrial Appendage to Predict Thrombosis Risk

Impact of left atrial wall motion assumptions in fluid simulations on proposed predictors of thrombus formation

The Impact of Left Atrium Appendage Morphology on Stroke Risk Assessment in Atrial Fibrillation: A Computational Fluid Dynamics Study

Joint Analysis of Morphological Parameters and In Silico Haemodynamics of the Left Atrial Appendage for Thrombogenic Risk Assessment

Identifying Left Atrium and Left Atrial Appendage Prone to Thrombus Formation in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Using Statistical Shape Modeling

Use of Speckle-Tracking Echocardiography to Stratify Risk of Atrial Fibrillation-Related Stroke: Comparison of Left Atrial and Atrial Appendage Mechanics

Subject-specific factors affecting particle residence time distribution of left atrial appendage in atrial fibrillation: A computational model-based study

P1360Association between left atrial appendage dysfunction and thromboembolic risk in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation

The Impact of Left Atrial Morphology on Thrombosis Risk in Atrial Fibrillation

Evaluation of Stroke Risk in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Using Morphological and Hemodynamic Characteristics