Abstract:Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, Ahead of Print. Without sufficient information about research data practices occurring in a particular research organisation, there is a risk of mismatching research data service efforts with the needs of its researchers. This study describes how data acquiring and data sharing occurring within a particular research organisation can be investigated by using current research information system publication data. The case study organisation's current research information system was used to identify the sample of investigated articles. A sample of 193 journal articles published by researchers in the computer science department of the case study's university during 2019 were extracted for scrutiny from the current research information system. For these 193 articles, a classification of the main study types was developed to accommodate the multidisciplinary nature of the case department's research agenda. Furthermore, a coding framework was developed to capture the key elements of data acquiring and data sharing. The articles representing life sciences and computational research relatively frequently reused open data, whereas data acquisition of experimental research, human interaction studies and human intervention studies often relied on collecting original data. Data sharing also differed between the computationally intensive study types of life sciences and computational research and the study types relying on collection of original data. Research data were not available for reuse in only a minority of life science (n = 2; 7%) and computational research (n = 15; 14%) studies. The study types of experimental research, human interaction studies and human intervention studies less frequently made their data available for reuse. The findings suggest that research organisations representing computer sciences may include different subfields that have their own cultures of data sharing. This study demonstrates that analyses of publications listed in current research information systems provide detailed descriptions how the affiliated researchers acquire and share research data.

Data sharing and reuse practices: disciplinary differences and improvements needed

Data sharing practices and data availability upon request differ across scientific disciplines

Data sharing practices in open access mode: a study of the willingness to share data in different disciplines

Data sharing, management, use, and reuse: Practices and perceptions of scientists worldwide

Seek and you may (not) find: A multi-institutional analysis of where research data are shared

Data sharing practices across knowledge domains: A dynamic examination of data availability statements in PLOS ONE publications

What Drives Academic Data Sharing?

Data sharing policies across health research globally: Cross‐sectional meta‐research study

From Data Creator to Data Reuser: Distance Matters

Uses and Reuses of Scientific Data: The Data Creators’ Advantage

Effect of impact factor and discipline on journal data sharing policies

Who Re-Uses Data? A Bibliometric Analysis of Dataset Citations

Using current research information systems to investigate data acquisition and data sharing practices of computer scientists

Perceived benefits of open data are improving but scientists still lack resources, skills, and rewards

Assessment of the impact of shared data on the scientific literature

The Landscape of Data Reuse in Interactive Information Retrieval: Motivations, Sources, and Evaluation of Reusability

A survey of researchers’ methods sharing practices and priorities

To what extent is researchers' data-sharing motivated by formal mechanisms of recognition and credit?

Talking datasets: Understanding data sensemaking behaviours

A Decade of Progress: Insights of Open Data Practices in Biosciences at the University of Edinburgh

Reuse‐oriented Data Publishing: How to Make the Shared Research Data Friendlier for Researchers