What Drives Academic Data Sharing?

Benedikt Fecher,Sascha Friesike,Marcel Hebing
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118053
IF: 3.7
2015-02-25
PLoS ONE
Abstract:Despite widespread support from policy makers, funding agencies, and scientific journals, academic researchers rarely make their research data available to others. At the same time, data sharing in research is attributed a vast potential for scientific progress. It allows the reproducibility of study results and the reuse of old data for new research questions. Based on a systematic review of 98 scholarly papers and an empirical survey among 603 secondary data users, we develop a conceptual framework that explains the process of data sharing from the primary researcher's point of view. We show that this process can be divided into six descriptive categories: Data donor, research organization, research community, norms, data infrastructure, and data recipients. Drawing from our findings, we discuss theoretical implications regarding knowledge creation and dissemination as well as research policy measures to foster academic collaboration. We conclude that research data cannot be regarded as knowledge commons, but research policies that better incentivise data sharing are needed to improve the quality of research results and foster scientific progress.
multidisciplinary sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is the phenomenon of insufficient data sharing in academic research. Although policymakers, funding agencies and scientific journals generally support data sharing, academic researchers rarely make their research data available for others to use. What are the reasons behind this phenomenon? What are the factors that impede or promote data sharing? Through a systematic review of 98 academic papers and an empirical survey of 603 secondary data users, the author has developed a conceptual framework to explain the process of data sharing from the perspective of principal investigators and divided it into six descriptive categories: data donors, research organizations, research communities, norms, data infrastructure and data recipients. The paper aims to promote academic cooperation, improve the quality of research results and promote the development of science through theoretical and policy recommendations.