Abstract:There is growing evidence that dialogic education is an effective way to teach the kind of general and transferable thinking skills and dispositions that have always been valued by the teaching thinking movement. However, dialogic theory implies an understanding of thinking, and, more specifically, of good thinking, that is distinctive. For dialogic theory, thinking is understood as an attribute of embodied dialogue. This means that thinking is not an abstract skill or set of skills separable from content knowledge and is not primarily something that is done by individuals but is in fact an effect of the ‘dialogic space’ that opens up when people or perspectives enter into dialogue. Learning to think can be understood as being drawn into dialogue and so teaching thinking is about drawing students into dialogue through invitations based upon relationships; drawing students into dialogue in classrooms through opening dialogic spaces; drawing children into the long-term dialogues of culture through teaching these in a way that focuses as much or more upon questions than upon already achieved answers; changing the culture of schools and classrooms to make them more supportive of dialogue; and, through Internet-mediated dialogue across difference, drawing students to participate in ongoing global dialogues as part of a long-term teaching thinking project to create a more intelligent planet. This chapter explores what dialogic theory has to say about what it means to teach for thinking, looking first at what it has to say about learning and teaching in general, then about what it has to say about thinking and learning to think. The metaphor of thinking as dialogue leads to an understanding of teaching thinking as drawing students into dialogue. The project of teaching thinking through engaging students in dialogue therefore connects a focus on dialogues in classrooms to the design of educational technologies, including pedagogies, which will promote and sustain a more global dialogue. A dialogic theory of teaching thinking suggests that it is important to teach cultures to think as well as individuals and ultimately to teach the increasingly global society to think. Finally, the chapter draws the different strands together into a coherent dialogic theory of how one can teach for thinking by opening, widening, deepening and sustaining dialogic spaces and dialogic space.

What is the “dialogical method” of teaching?

What is dialogic teaching? Constructing, deconstructing, and reconstructing a pedagogy of classroom talk

A dialogic theory of teaching thinking

Paulo Freire’s Radical Democratic Humanism

Knowledge, Dialogue, and Humanization: The Moral Philosophy of Paulo Freire

Dialogue in the Israeli Classroom: Types of Teacher–Student Talk

Educating with Paulo Freire: Teaching and learning on the digital culture

EDUCATIONAL DIALOGUE IN MODERN HIGHER EDUCATION: PSYCHODIDACTIC CONTEXT

Dialogue and the Good: Fingers Pointing at the Moon?

Psychotherapy of the oppressed: the education of Paulo Freire in dialogue with phenomenology

Towards a dialogic theory of education for the Internet Age

Implications for Social Impact of Dialogic Teaching and Learning

Dialogic Leadership for Social Justice: Overcoming Pathologies of Silence

Dialogic teaching: towards reconfiguring classroom talk about sexuality

Dialogue on ethics and ethics of dialogue: an exploratory study

Dialogue-oriented Chinese Education in Ethnic Preparatory Education

Deep Thinking or Resistance? On Finding a Middle Ground between Paolo Freire’s Critical Pedagogy and John Dewey’s Pragmatism

Sociological Theory from Dialogic Democracy

Paths in Utopia: School as Holding Environment for the Dialogical Self

Dialogic validation: a discourse analysis for conceptual development within dialogic classroom interaction

Dialogic education for classroom teaching: a critical review