Abstract:Software defect prediction is one of the most active fields in software engineering. Recently, some experts have proposed the Just-in-time Defect Prediction Technology. Just-in-time Defect prediction technology has become a hot topic in defect prediction due to its directness and fine granularity. This technique can predict whether a software defect exists in every code change submitted by a developer. In addition, the method has the advantages of high speed and easy tracking. However, the biggest challenge is that the prediction accuracy of Just-in-Time software is affected by the data set category imbalance. In most cases, 20% of defects in software engineering may be in 80% of modules, and code changes that do not cause defects account for a large proportion. Therefore, there is an imbalance in the data set, that is, the imbalance between a few classes and a majority of classes, which will affect the classification prediction effect of the model. Furthermore, because most features do not result in code changes that cause defects, it is not easy to achieve the desired results in practice even though the model is highly predictive. In addition, the features of the data set contain many irrelevant features and redundant features, which are invalid data, which will increase the complexity of the prediction model and reduce the prediction efficiency. To improve the prediction efficiency of Just-in-Time defect prediction technology. We trained a just-in-time defect prediction model using six open source projects from different fields based on random forest classification. LIME Interpretability technique is used to explain the model to a certain extent. By using explicable methods to extract meaningful, relevant features, the experiment can only need 45% of the original work to explain the prediction results of the prediction model and identify critical features through explicable techniques, and only need 96% of the original work to achieve this goal, under the premise of ensuring specific prediction effects. Therefore, the application of interpretable techniques can significantly reduce the workload of developers and improve work efficiency.

Software Failure Prediction Based On Program State and First-Error Characteristics

Effective Software Fault Localization Using Predicted Execution Results.

Detection Software Content Failures Using Dynamic Execution Information

Performance Comparison of Various Algorithms During Software Fault Prediction

HEDP: A Method for Early Forecasting Software Defects based on Human Error Mechanisms

Hybrid Software Reliability Prediction Model Based On Residual Errors

Software Reliability Prediction and Analysis During Operational Use.

SOFTWARE DEFECT PREDICTION USING THE MACHINE LEARNING METHODS

Analysis of Software Reliability Modeling Considering Testing Compression Factor and Failure-to-Fault Relationship.

Applying Machine Learning Analysis for Software Quality Test

Use of Deep Learning Model with Attention Mechanism for Software Fault Prediction

Variance of ML-based software fault predictors: are we really improving fault prediction?

Software visualization and deep transfer learning for effective software defect prediction

Software defect prediction: future directions and challenges

Software Defect Prediction Model Based on Attention Mechanism

Enhancing Software Reliability Against Soft Error Using Critical Data Model.

Interpretability application of the Just-in-Time software defect prediction model

Fault Prediction for Large Scale Projects Using Deep Learning Techniques

Deep Learning-Based Software Defect Prediction via Semantic Key Features of Source Code—Systematic Survey

Just-in-time Defect Prediction for Software Hunks

Empirical Analysis of Network Measures for Predicting High Severity Software Faults