Abstract:Most software defect prediction approaches are trained and applied on data from the same project. However, often a new project does not have enough training data. Cross-project defect prediction, which uses data from other projects to predict defects in a particular project, provides a new perspective to defect prediction. In this work, we propose a HYbrid moDel Reconstruction Approach (HYDRA) for cross-project defect prediction, which includes two phases: genetic algorithm (GA) phase and ensemble learning (EL) phase. These two phases create a massive composition of classifiers. To examine the benefits of HYDRA, we perform experiments on 29 datasets from the PROMISE repository which contains a total of 11,196 instances (i.e., Java classes) labeled as defective or clean. We experiment with logistic regression as the underlying classification algorithm of HYDRA. We compare our approach with the most recently proposed cross-project defect prediction approaches: TCA+ by Nam et al., Peters filter by Peters et al., GP by Liu et al., MO by Canfora et al., and CODEP by Panichella et al. Our results show that HYDRA achieves an average F1-score of 0.544. On average, across the 29 datasets, these results correspond to an improvement in the F1-scores of 26.22, 34.99, 47.43, 28.61, and 30.14 percent over TCA+, Peters filter, GP, MO, and CODEP, respectively. In addition, HYDRA on average can discover 33 percent of all bugs if developers inspect the top 20 percent lines of code, which improves the best baseline approach (TCA+) by 44.41 percent. We also find that HYDRA improves the F1-score of Zero-R which predict all the instances to be defective by 5.42 percent, but improves Zero-R by 58.65 percent when inspecting the top 20 percent lines of code. In practice, Zero-R can be hard to use since it simply predicts all of the instances to be defective, and thus developers have to inspect all of the instances to find the defective ones. Moreover, we notice the improvement of HYDRA over other baseline approaches in terms of F1-score and when inspecting the top 20 percent lines of code are substantial, and in most cases the improvements are significant and have large effect sizes across the 29 datasets.

Software visualization and deep transfer learning for effective software defect prediction

Unifying Defect Prediction, Categorization, and Repair by Multi-Task Deep Learning

Deep Learning for Just-In-Time Defect Prediction

HYDRA: Massively Compositional Model for Cross-Project Defect Prediction

A Survey on Software Defect Prediction Using Deep Learning

Deep Semantic Feature Learning for Software Defect Prediction

SDP-MTF: A Composite Transfer Learning and Feature Fusion for Cross-Project Software Defect Prediction

Use of Deep Learning Model with Attention Mechanism for Software Fault Prediction

Studying the effectiveness of deep active learning in software defect prediction

Deep Semantic Feature Learning with Embedded Static Metrics for Software Defect Prediction

Understanding machine learning software defect predictions

Deep Learning-Based Software Defect Prediction via Semantic Key Features of Source Code—Systematic Survey

Deep Learning Software Defect Prediction Methods for Cloud Environments Research

An Approach to Semantic and Structural Features Learning for Software Defect Prediction

Transfer Learning based Low Shot Classifier for Software Defect Prediction

LineFlowDP: A Deep Learning-Based Two-Phase Approach for Line-Level Defect Prediction

A Cross-Project Defect Prediction Model Based on Deep Learning With Self-Attention

Software Defect Prediction via Deep Belief Network

An Improved Semi-Supervised Learning Method for Software Defect Prediction.

Multiview Transfer Learning for Software Defect Prediction.

A novel defect prediction method based on semantic feature enhancement