The Story of the Parallelogram

Robert C. Yates
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5951/mt.33.7.0301
1940-11-01
The Mathematics Teacher
Abstract:Recently I made a poll of a large number of students on the status of the rather uninteresting parallelogram. Discounting the defining statement that it has equal opposite sides, I could find no information at large other than “its diagonals bisect each other.” Somehow this rather unpretentious figure has been laid aside to rust and I propose here to apply a bit of polish to see if its lustre cannot be brought forth in true brilliance. I think you will agree in the end that it does possess some memorable qualities which, although interesting, we are asked to establish equivalence of two plane polygons of equal area by imposing one upon another. If these polygons are not identical in size and shape, then it follows that we should be able to create partial polygons from each given figure in such a way that these partial polygons will be congruent in pairs. In this transformation from one given polygon to another by dissection the parallelogram plays a central role that is highly important.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?