Abstract:We examine the effectiveness of institutional investors in constraining aggressive earnings management induced by strong contractual incentives. To this end we focus on the consequences of earnings-related promises (covenants) negotiated between corporate controlling shareholders and minority shareholders during China's split-share structure reform, wherein failure to achieve profit benchmarks had the potential to transfer significant wealth from controlling to minority shareholders. Our initial analysis provides evidence that profit-promised firm-years are, on average, associated with income-increasing earnings management, and that this association is stronger for: (i) firm-years in which the profit-promise was satisfied, and (ii) firm-years in which proxies for the level of unmanaged earnings suggest that earnings management was needed to satisfy the promise. However, such benchmark-beating behavior is weaker for firms with higher levels of institutional ownership. Further analysis documents that the exit threat of institutional shareholders can discipline earnings management associated with profit promises. We also show that the effect of institutional shareholders in reducing earnings management associated with profit promises is greater for domestic mutual funds and for privately controlled firms. Interestingly, our evidence suggests that institutional investors only play an effective monitoring role over earnings management when their incentives are strongly aligned with those of other minority owners. In other cases, our evidence suggests that these investors may exacerbate the level of earnings management.

Foreign institutional investors' certification and domestic minority shareholders' mistrust

Disproportional Ownership Structure and Stock Market Liquidity in China

Are Foreign Institutions More or Less Informed? Evidence from China's Stock Markets

Institutional Investors and Earnings Management Associated with Controlling Shareholders' Promises: Evidence from the Split Share Structure Reform in China

Corporate Governance and Financial Reporting Quality : Evidence from the Split Share Structure Reform in China

Enhancing external oversight: The complementary role of regulatory minority shareholders in China

Mixed-Ownership Reform and Private Firms’ Corporate Social Responsibility Practices: Evidence From China

Institutional Reforms and Foreign Market Entry of Emerging Market Firms: An Extended Firm-Specific Framework

Corporate Governance of Controlling Shareholders and Labor Employment Decisions: Evidence from a Parent Board Reform in China

Mixed ownership reform, political connections, and overinvestment

Split-Share Structure Reform,Voluntary Disclosure and Corporate Governance

Corporate Governance and the Determinants of the Compensation Ratio in the Splitting-Share Reform

An Empirical Study of the Split-share Structure Reform and Corporate Governance

The effects of trading rights and ownership structures on the informativeness of accounting earnings: Evidence from China’ split share structure reform

Foreign ownership and stock liquidity uncertainty

The Effects of Trading Rights and Ownership Structure on the Informativeness of Accounting Earnings: Evidence from China’ Split Share Structure Reform

RETAIL INVESTORS’ BIASED BELIEFS ABOUT STOCKS THAT THEY HOLD: EVIDENCE FROM CHINA’S SPLIT SHARE STRUCTURE REFORM

How Does a Regulatory Minority Shareholder Influence the ESG Performance? A Quasi-Natural Experiment

Fama-French Three Factors Model and the Effect of the Split-share Structure Reform

Corporate Social Responsibility and Investor Relations Management: Evidence from China

Signaling, auditing fees, and earnings surprise before and after split-share structure reform in China