Hepatic Steatosis Has No Effect in Diagnosis Accuracy of LI‐RADS v2018 Categorization of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in MR Imaging

Shan Yao,Yi Wei,Zheng Ye,Jie Chen,Ting Duan,Zhen Zhang,Bin Song

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.27783

IF: 4.4

2021-06-13

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Abstract:<section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Background</h3><p>In clinical practice, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is widely diagnosed by using MRI, however, whether the imaging features are affected by hepatic steatosis (HS) is still unknown.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Purpose</h3><p>To investigate and compare the differences in HCC related imaging features between with- and without-HS groups, and to further determine whether HS affects the diagnosis accuracy of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) v2018 of HCC in MRI.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Study Type</h3><p>Prospective.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Subjects</h3><p>One hundred and seventy-one patients (mean age, 52 ± 11 years; range, 26–83 years) including 137 men and 34 women.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Field Strength/Sequence</h3><p>3.0 T, gradient echo (GRE).</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Assessment</h3><p>Subjects were classified as HS and non-HS groups according to MRI-proton density fat-fraction (PDFF). HS was defined as MRI-PDFF &gt;5.6%. Three radiologists accessed HCC features and assigned LI-RADS categories in MRI independently based on LI-RADS v2018. Frequencies of HCC major features and LR categorization assignment between the two groups as well as interobserver agreement between the two radiologists were assessed.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Statistical Tests</h3><p>Unpaired <i>t</i>-test, Chi-square test, Fisher's exact test, kappa statistic, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). A two-sided <i>P</i> value &lt;0.05 was considered as statistically significant. </p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Results</h3><p>Major features including arterial hyperenhancement (APHE), enhancing "capsule" and nonperipheral "washout" observed between HS and non-HS groups were not significantly different (78.95% vs.78.62%, <i>P</i> = 0.866; 57.89% vs.52.98%, <i>P</i> = 0.483; and 75% vs.81.46%, <i>P</i> = 0.257, respectively), and the assessment of observation size showed a borderline difference (<i>P</i> = 0.059). No significant difference in LR-5 assignment between the two groups (69.74% vs. 72.85% for reader 1, <i>P</i> = 0.641; 71.05% vs. 72.19% for reader 2, <i>P</i> = 0.877). Interobserver agreement between the two radiologists showed almost perfect in LR-5 assignment (<i>κ</i> = 0.869) and size observation (ICC = 0.997). </p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Data Conclusion</h3><p>The diagnosis of HCC based on LI-RADS v2018 in MRI is of comparable performance regardless of HS, in which there is no significant difference in either the major imaging features or LR categorization.</p><p><b>Level of Evidence</b>: 2 </p><p><b>Technical Efficacy Stage</b>: 2 </p></section>

radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging