Abstract:INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to analyze the current literature for the best evidence (randomized clinical trials) about the efficacy of functional appliances on mandibular growth in the short term.METHODS: A survey of articles published up to September 2009 was performed by using the following electronic databases: PubMed, Embase, Ovid Medline, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, LILACS, and Google Scholar. The reference lists of the retrieved articles were hand-searched for possible missing articles. No language restriction was applied during the identification of the published studies. A methodologic scoring process was developed to identify which randomized clinical trials were stronger methodologically. The selection process and the quality assessment were undertaken independently and in duplicate by 2 authors. A meta-analysis was attempted by using random-effects models. Clinical and statistical heterogeneity was examined, and a sensitivity analysis was performed.RESULTS: Electronic searches identified the following items: 146 articles were retrieved from PubMed, 45 from Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, 29 from Ovid, 42 from LILACS, 628 from Web of Science, and 1000 from Google Scholar. Thirty-two articles fulfilled the specific inclusion criteria and were identified as potentially appropriate randomized clinical trials to be included in this meta-analysis. Only 4 articles, based on data from 338 patients (168 treated vs 170 controls) with Class II malocclusion in the mixed dentition, were selected for the final analysis. The quality analysis of these studies showed that the statistical methods were at the medium-high level. The outcome measurements chosen to evaluate the efficacy of the various functional appliances were Co-Pg, Pg/Olp + Co/Olp, and Co-Gn and the values were annualized and standardized to a uniform scale with the standardized mean differences (SMD). The results of the meta-analysis from the random-effects model showed a statistically significant difference of 1.79 mm in annual mandibular growth of the treatment group compared with the control group (SMD = 0.61, 95% CI, 0.30 to -0.93; chi-square test, 5.34; 3 df; P = 0.15; I(2) = 43.9%; test for overall effect, Z = 3.83 and P = 0.0001). The sensitivity analysis showed a substantially similar outcome of 1.91 mm (SMD = 0.65, 95% CI, 0.25 to 1.25; chi-square test, 4.96; 2 df; P = 0.08; I(2) = 59.7%; test for overall effect, Z = 3.19 and P = 0.001).CONCLUSIONS: The analysis of the effect of treatment with functional appliances vs an untreated control group showed that skeletal changes were statistically significant, but unlikely to be clinically significant.

Effectiveness of micro-implant in vertical control during orthodontic extraction treatment in class II adults and adolescents after pubertal growth peak: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Clinical Efficacy of Counterclockwise Rotating the Functional Occlusal Plane Using Micro-Implant Anchorage.

Meta-Analysis Dataset Comparing Orthodontic Mini-Implants And Conventional Anchorage Reinforcement For Maximum Orthodontic Anchorage

[Stability of Upper Molars with the Application of Implant Anchorage].

Therapeutic effect of Micro-Implant Anchorage in orthodontics

The Preliminary Clinical Study of Posterior Vertical Control of High Angle Non-Openbite Extraction Cases Through Microscrew Implant Anchorage

Efficacy and safety of micro-implant anchorage in Angle class II malocclusion orthodontic treatment: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis

The Vertical Control Effect of Mini-Implant Anchorage in High-Angle Adult Patients: a Comparison Study

Application of the microimplant treatment for Angle's Class Ⅱ Division ⅠMalocclusion with the vertical macroplasia of anterior of superior alveoli

Vertical effects of Class Ⅱ elastics in dolichofacial adult extraction cases

Comparison Of Orthodontic Tooth Movement Between Adolescents And Adults Based On Implant Superimposition

Impact of micro-osteoperforations on root resorption and alveolar bone in en-masse retraction in young adults: A CBCT randomized controlled clinical trial

Comparative Analysis of the Effects of Micro-Implant and J Hook Treatment for Adult Patients of Angle Class Ⅱ Division 1 Malocclusion with the Anterior of the Alveolar Vertical Macroplasia

Vertical dimensional change of upper molars in extraction orthodontic treatment with micro-screw anchorage

Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Control Of Maxillary Anchorage With 2 Retraction Techniques Editor'S Comment

Craniofacial changes of high angle extraction cases treated with posterior vertical control through implant anchorage

[Meta-analysis of the efficacy of bone anchorage and maxillary facemask protraction devices in treating skeletal class Ⅲ malocclusion in adolescents]

What is the impact of patient attributes, implant characteristics, surgical techniques, and placement location on the success of orthodontic mini-implants in young adults? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Preliminary three-dimensional analysis of tooth movement and arch dimension change of the maxillary dentition in Class II division 1 malocclusion treated with first premolar extraction: conventional anchorage vs. mini-implant anchorage

Effectiveness of orthodontic treatment with functional appliances on mandibular growth in the short term

A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis of Orthopedic Treatment in Class III Malocclusions: Maxillary Protraction with Skeletal Anchorage or a Rapid Maxillary Expander.