Abstract:Introduction: The goal of this retrospective cephalometric study was to compare orthodontic outcomes in patients with maxillary dentoalveolar protrusion malocclusion treated with extraoral headgear or mini-implants for maximum anchorage. Materials: Forty-seven subjects with Angle Class II malocclusion or Class I bimaxillary dentoalveolar protrusion were treated by retracting the maxillary dentoalveolar process by using the extraction space of the bilateral maxillary first premolars. Two anchorage systems were used. Group 1 (n = 22) received traditional anchorage preparation with a transpalatal arch and headgear; group 2 (n = 25) received mini-implants (miniplates, miniscrews, or microscrews) for bony anchorage. Pretreatment and posttreatment lateral cephalograms were superimposed to compare the following parameters between groups: (1) amount of maxillary central incisor retraction, (2) reduction in maxillary central incisor angulation, (3) anchorage loss of the maxillary first molar, (4) movements of the maxillary central incisor and first molar in the vertical direction, and (5) changes in skeletal measurements representing the anteroposterior and vertical jaw relationships. Results: The skeletal anchorage group had greater anterior tooth retraction (8.17 vs 6.73 mm) and less maxillary molar mesialization (0.88 vs 2.07 mm) than did the headgear group, with a shorter treatment duration (29.81 vs 32.29 months). Translational movement of the incisors was more common than tipping movement, and intrusion of the maxillary dentition was greater, in patients receiving miniplates than in those receiving screw-type bony anchorage, resulting in counterclockwise rotation of the mandible and a statistically significant decrease in the mandibular plane angle. Cephalometric analysis of skeletal measurements in patients with low to average mandibular plane angles showed no significant difference between groups, although greater maxillary incisor retraction and less mesial movement of the first molar were noted in the mini-implant group. In patients with a high mandibular plane angle, those receiving skeletal anchorage had genuine intrusion of the maxillary first molar and reduction in the mandibular plane angle, whereas those receiving headgear anchorage had extrusion of the maxillary first molar and an increase of mandibular plane angle. In contrast to the posterior movement in the headgear group, anterior movement of Point A was noted in the mini-implant group. Conclusions: In both the anteroposterior and vertical directions, skeletal anchorage achieved better control than did the traditional headgear appliance during the treatment of maxillary dentoalveolar protrusion. Greater retraction of the maxillary incisor, less anchorage loss of the maxillary first molar, and the possibility of counterclockwise mandibular rotation all facilitated the correction of the Class II malocclusion.

Meta-Analysis Dataset Comparing Orthodontic Mini-Implants And Conventional Anchorage Reinforcement For Maximum Orthodontic Anchorage

What is the impact of patient attributes, implant characteristics, surgical techniques, and placement location on the success of orthodontic mini-implants in young adults? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Critical factors for the success of orthodontic mini-implants: A systematic review

Comparative Study of Mini-implants versus Standard Implants in Orthodontic Anchorage for Space Closure

Impact of various aligner auxiliaries on orthodontic activity: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

Comparison of treatment outcomes between skeletal anchorage and extraoral anchorage in adults with maxillary dentoalveolar protrusion

[Clinical Application of Miniscrew Implant for Maximum Anchorage Cases].

Preliminary three-dimensional analysis of tooth movement and arch dimension change of the maxillary dentition in Class II division 1 malocclusion treated with first premolar extraction: conventional anchorage vs. mini-implant anchorage

Efficacy and safety of micro-implant anchorage in Angle class II malocclusion orthodontic treatment: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis

Evaluation of the Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) With Temporary Skeletal Anchorage Devices in Fixed Orthodontic Treatment: A Systematic Review

The Vertical Control Effect of Mini-Implant Anchorage in High-Angle Adult Patients: a Comparison Study

Effectiveness of micro-implant in vertical control during orthodontic extraction treatment in class II adults and adolescents after pubertal growth peak: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Tooth movement with dental anchorage vs. skeletal anchorage: A systematic review of clinical trials

Factors associated with the stability of mini-implants for orthodontic anchorage: a study of 414 samples in Taiwan

Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Control Of Maxillary Anchorage With 2 Retraction Techniques Editor'S Comment

Comparison Of Orthodontic Tooth Movement Between Adolescents And Adults Based On Implant Superimposition

Maxillary Molar Intrusion Evaluation using Mini-implants along with Transpalatal Arch Bar

Biomechanical analysis of miniscrew-assisted molar distalization with clear aligners: a three-dimensional finite element study

Three-dimensional finite element analysis of upper anterior teeth retraction and intrusion using clear aligners and mini-implants

Dentoskeletal and soft tissue changes associated with miniscrew anchorage in customized lingual orthodontics

Therapeutic effect of Micro-Implant Anchorage in orthodontics