Abstract:To the Editor: The journal "impact factor (IF)" was conceived by Garfield in 1955 to help librarians identify the most influential journals based on the number of citations, and the first ranking of journals by IF was published in 1972.[1] We systematically analyzed the IFs of emergency medicine journals published in Journal Citation Report® (JCR) for the past 10 years (2005–2014). Twenty-four journals in emergency medicine are listed according to the 2014 JCR Science Edition [Table 1]. Nine journals have originated from the USA, four from the UK, four from Germany, and others from seven different countries. The number of journals increased from 11 in 2005 to 24 in 2014. Compared with 2005 (or the 1st year IF documentation), the IFs of 17 out of 24 journals increased in 2014, with a median level of +62.42% (ranging from +0.31% to +344.44%), while seven journals' IFs decreased, with a median level of −10.78% (ranging from −1.825% to −36.108%).Table 1: Change in IF of emergency medicine journals from 2005 to 2014In the majority of emergency medicine journals, the IF shows a gradually increasing trend. The mean and median levels of IF increase from 2005 to 2014 are 1.876% and 36.069%, respectively. In journals in English language, those from Europe had a higher increase than those from the USA ([0.745 ± 0.538] vs. [0.693 ± 0.588], 0.555 [ranging from −0.151 to +1.363] vs. 0.402 [ranging from −0.720 to +1.894]); this similar phenomenon also appears in the subject category of critical care medicine and infectious diseases.[2] While considering originating countries, the mean IF of journals from the USA shows higher than that from European countries. One factor is language. Editors of the European journals traditionally published in local languages have made an attempt over the last years to change the language of publication into English, so as to increase the appearance of the journals in the scientific community.[3] This might have led to a rise of the IF. Since 2003, the "category data" of journals of each discipline has been available, and there were 171 categories in 2005, which rose to 176 categories in 2014. Among the 32 categories related to clinical medicine, the aggregate IF and the median IF of emergency medicine journals ranked 29–31 and 27–32 through the period of 2005–2014, respectively. This directly indicates that emergency medicine developed slowly in research. Possible reasons are that on the one hand, emergency medical journals published more randomized trials, status analysis, and less large-scale clinical trials and basic researches, which affected the increase in their IFs, and on the other hand, a lot of quality articles contributed to specialized journals.[4] Unequal distribution of emergency resources also hinders the entire discipline development.[5] Despite the general increase in IF, emergency medicine in research remains a slow development. Emergency medicine specialists are still few and tend to work in large emergency departments seeing critically ill patients. We are confident that the medical quality and scientific development of emergency medicine will consistently improve. Financial support and sponsorship This study was supported by a grant of The Beijing Municipal Science and Technology Project (No. Z1311070022131142), Peking University Key Clinical Project (No. bysy2012208). Conflicts of interest There are no conflicts of interest.

Does the journal impact factor reflect the impact of German medical guideline contributions?

Association between quality of clinical practice guidelines and citations given to their references

Auto-correlation of journal impact factor for consensus research reporting statements: a cohort study

Medical articles in questionable journals are less impactful than those in non-questionable journals but still extensively cited

Impact of Article Language in Multi-Language Medical Journals - a Bibliometric Analysis of Self-Citations and Impact Factor

What is the impact of a research publication?

Highly cited German research contributions to the fields of radiation oncology, biology, and physics: focus on collaboration and diversity

The impact factor of rheumatology journals: an analysis of 2008 and the recent 10 years

Quality of Critical Care Clinical Practice Guidelines: Assessment with AGREE II Instrument.

The Citation Impact of German Sociology Journals: Some Problems with the Use of Scientometric Indicators in Journal and Research Evaluations

Barriers and facilitators of adherence to clinical practice guidelines in Germany—A systematic review

Variations in Citations Across Databases: Implications for Journal Impact Factors

Guidance in author instructions of hematology and oncology journals: A cross sectional and longitudinal study

The impact of a digital guideline version on schizophrenia guideline knowledge: results from a multicenter cluster-randomized controlled trial

The level of non-citation of articles within a journal as a measure of quality: a comparison to the impact factor

National and International Comparisons of Gynecological Research in Germany Based on a Bibliometric Analysis of PublicationsForschung in der Frauenheilkunde im internationalen und nationalen Vergleich auf Basis einer bibliometrischen Analyse von Publikationen

In which fields do higher impact journals publish higher quality articles?

Citation analysis of orthopaedic literature; 18 major orthopaedic journals compared for Impact Factor and SCImago

Investigation and Evaluation of Chinese Clinical Practice Guidelines Published in Medical Journals in 2019: Analysis of the Evidence

Questioning the Impact of the Impact Factor. A Brief Review and Future Directions

Analysis of the Impact Factor of Emergency Medicine Journals in the Past 10 Years