Abstract:Chapter 4 presented an extensive account of current understanding of climate change. The evidence that humans are having an important impact on the global climate system is scientifically compelling. And yet there are those who disagree and refuse to accept the evidence. Some of the dissent is based on a visceral feeling that the world is too big for humans to have the capacity to change it. Some is grounded, I believe, on ideology, on an instinctive distrust of science combined with a suspicion of govern¬ment, amplified by a feeling that those in authority are trying to use the issue to advance some other agenda, to increase taxes, for example. More insidious are dissenting views expressed by scientists on the opinion pages of influential newspapers such as The Wall Street Journal (WSJ). If scientists disagree, the implication for the public is that there is no urgency: we can afford to wait until the dust settles before deciding to take action— or not, as the case may be. Missing in the discourse triggered by these communications is the fact that, with few exceptions, the authors of these articles are not well informed on climate science. To put it bluntly, their views reflect personal opinion and in some cases explicit prejudice rather than objective analysis. Their communications are influential, nonetheless, and demand a response. I begin by addressing some of the general sentiments expressed by those who are either on the fence as to the significance of human- induced climate change or who may already have made up their minds that the issue is part of an elaborate hoax to mislead the public. There are a number of recurrent themes: The data purporting to show that the world is warming have been manipu-lated by climate scientists to enhance their funding or for other self- serving reasons.Climate science is complicated; scientists cannot predict the weather. Why should we believe that they could tell us what is going to happen a decade or more in the future? The planet has been warmer in the past; we survived and maybe even prospered.

Evangelicals and global warming

Addressing Global Warming Denialism

The politics of climate denialism and the secondary denialism of economics

Contemporary American Evangelicals and the Human Rights Diplomacy in the U.S

Global Warming: the Sacrificial Temptation

Human- Induced Climate Change Arguments Offered By Those Who Dissent

Changes in Global Warming's Six Americas: an analysis of repeat respondents

Climate change belief, sustainability education, and political values: Assessing the need for higher-education curriculum reform

Factual or Moral Persuasion in the United States? Evidence from the Papal Encyclical on Climate Change

The Politicization of Climate Science: Media Consumption, Perceptions of Science and Scientists, and Support for Policy

The social anatomy of climate change denial in the United States

The use of religious metaphors by UK newspapers to describe and denigrate climate change

Who Cares More About the Environment, Those with an Intrinsic, an Extrinsic, a Quest, or an Atheistic Religious Orientation?: Investigating the Effect of Religious Ad Appeals on Attitudes Toward the Environment

A longitudinal study of attitudes toward evolution among undergraduates who are members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints

The impact of elite frames and motivated reasoning on beliefs in a global warming conspiracy: The promise and limits of trust

The Rise of Global Warming Skepticism: Exploring Affective Image Associations in the United States Over Time

How religiosity and spirituality influences the ecologically conscious consumer psychology of Christians, the non-religious, and atheists in the United States

Motivated reasoning and climate change: Comparing news sources, politicization, intensification, and qualification in denier versus believer subreddit comments

Growing deviations between elite and non-elite media coverage of climate change in the United States

Christian Higher Education in the United States: The Crisis of Evangelical Identity

Public Awareness of the Scientific Consensus on Climate