Abstract:The present paper reports an experiment with a two-year-delayed (M = 695 days) follow-up that tests an approach to raising willingness to take political and personal climate actions. Many Americans still do not view climate change as a threat requiring urgent action. Moreover, among American conservatives, higher science literacy is paradoxically associated with higher anthropogenic climate-change skepticism. Our experimental materials were designed to harness the power of two central cognitive constraints - coherence and causal invariance, which map onto two narrative proclivities that anthropologists have identified as universal - to promote climate action across the political spectrum. Towards that goal, the essential role of these constraints in the causal-belief-formation process predicts that climate-change information would be more persuasive when it is embedded in a personal climate-action narrative, the evocation of which can benefit from exposure to parsimonious scientific explanations of indisputable everyday observations, juxtaposed with reasoners' own, typically less coherent explanations, occurring in a context that engages their moral stance. Our brief one-time intervention, conducted in ten U.S. states with the highest level of climate skepticism, showed that across the political spectrum, our materials raised appreciation of science, openness to alternative views, and willingness to take climate actions in the immediate assessment. It also raised how likely were reports two years later of having taken those actions or would have taken them had the opportunity existed, suggesting a long-lasting effect. Our approach adopts the framework that conceptions of reality are representations, and adaptive solutions in that infinite space of representations require cognitive constraints to narrow the search.

Factual or Moral Persuasion in the United States? Evidence from the Papal Encyclical on Climate Change

Elite cues, media coverage, and public concern: an integrated path analysis of public opinion on climate change, 2001–2013

Addressing Global Warming Denialism

Effects of system-sanctioned framing on climate awareness and environmental action in the United States and beyond

A representative survey experiment of motivated climate change denial

Experimental Effects of Climate Messages Vary Geographically

The effect of different extreme weather events on attitudes toward climate change

Science-Consistent Climate Health Beliefs As Predictors of Climate Behaviors and Support for Inflation Reduction Act Provisions and a Carbon Emissions Tax

Public Awareness of the Scientific Consensus on Climate

Elite Speech about Climate Change: Analysis of Sentiment from the United Nations Conference of Parties, 1995–2021

The Rise of Global Warming Skepticism: Exploring Affective Image Associations in the United States Over Time

Who Cares More About the Environment, Those with an Intrinsic, an Extrinsic, a Quest, or an Atheistic Religious Orientation?: Investigating the Effect of Religious Ad Appeals on Attitudes Toward the Environment

Change in US state-level public opinion about climate change: 2008-2020

Is Climate Change a Moral Issue? Effects of Egoism and Altruism on Pro-Environmental Behavior

The Cost of Climate Action: Experimental Evidence on the Impact of Climate Information on Charitable Donations to Climate Activism

The Politicization of Climate Science: Media Consumption, Perceptions of Science and Scientists, and Support for Policy

Promoting climate actions: A cognitive-constraints approach

The influence of partisan news on climate mitigation support: An investigation into the mediating role of perceived risk and efficacy

Compelling evidence: an influence on middle school students’ accounts that may impact decision-making about socioscientific issues

The Society of Information and the European Citizens' Perception of Climate Change: Natural or Anthropological Causes

National Prisms of a Global Phenomenon: A Comparative Study of Press Coverage of Climate Change in the US, UK and China