Abstract:Abstract There has been an increasing role in the use of injectable fillers for rejuvenation of the aging face. In this systematic review, we aim to evaluate the existing literature related to soft tissue fillers of the midface. Specifically, we focus on the non-hyaluronic acid fillers including polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA), poly-L-lactic acid (PLLA), calcium hydroxyapatite (CaHA), and autologous fat. A systematic review was conducted in November 2020 in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines with PubMed and Embase databases. Medical Subject Headings terms used were “cheek” OR “midface” OR “malar” and “filler” OR “poly-L-lactic acid” OR “calcium hydroxyapatite,” “autologous fat” OR “polymethylmethacrylate” OR “Artefill” OR “Bellafill” OR “Radiesse” OR “Sculptra.” The initial search identified 271 articles. After 145 duplicates were removed, 126 studies were screened for relevance by title and abstract. A total of 114 studies were eliminated based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. Twelve articles underwent full-text review. Seven articles were included in the final analysis consisting of four non-hyaluronic filler products: PMMA, PLLA, CaHA, autologous fat. Most patients were highly satisfied with their results. Due to the gradual volumizing effects of PMMA, PLLA, and CaHA, patient satisfaction generally improved over time. Minor adverse reactions related to treatment included bruising, swelling, and pain. Nodule formation was reported in PLLA and CaHA studies. For autologous fat, 32% of the original injection volume remained at 16 months post-treatment, which still provided clinically improved malar enhancement. Dermal fillers are an attractive treatment option for the aging face due to their high patient satisfaction, long-lasting effects, and low side-effect profile. Patients should be appropriately counseled on the delayed effects of non-HA fillers. Autologous fat is a good option in many patients with the major drawback of unpredictable longevity, which may require a secondary procedure. Future studies should examine the longevity and long-term side effects of these fillers.

Current Practices and Trends in Midface Rejuvenation

Facial Rejuvenation: A Global Trend of Dermatological Procedures in the Last Decade

Rejuvenation of the Upper Face and Brow: Neuromodulators and Fillers

Advancement of midface rejuvenation

Volumetric Perceptions in Midfacial Aging with Altered Priorities for Rejuvenation

Application of Nonsurgical Modalities in Improving Facial Aging

Understanding the Interplay Between Skin, Fascia, and Muscles of the Midface in Facial Aging

Midface Anatomy, Aging, and Aesthetic Analysis

Midface rejuvenation using Juvederm fillers in male patients

Dual-Plane Midface Lift Through Transoral and Transtemporal Approach

A 360° Approach to Patient Care in Aesthetic Facial Rejuvenation

Clinical Efficacy and Safety of a Focused-Radiofrequency Device on Middle and Lower Face Rejuvenation: a Retrospective Clinical Study.

Evaluating resurfacing modalities in aesthetics

Three Key Submuscular Points for Nonsurgical Rejuvenation of the Midface in Caucasian Patients: A Methodological Approach Using Injectable Hyaluronic Acid Fillers

A Review of Midface Aging

Racial Perspectives on Facelifts: Evaluating Techniques and Outcomes Across Diverse Populations

Noninvasive Physical Treatments in Facial Rejuvenation

The Selection of Facelift Approach on the Basis of Midfacial Ptosis

Non-Hyaluronic Acid Fillers for Midface Augmentation: A Systematic Review

Multimodal Facial Aesthetic Treatment on the Appearance of Aging, Social Confidence, and Psychological Well-being: HARMONY Study