Hysteroscopy after conservative surgical treatment of severe postpartum hemorrhage due to uterine atony: A systematic literature review

Chiheb Zouaghi,Mohamed Ali Chaouch,Stephane Sanchez,Sondes Zouaghi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.14704
2023-01-31
Abstract:Objective To assess the prevalence of IUAns, primarily adhesions (IUAds), after conservative surgical treatment of SPPH‐UA and determine patient eligibility for hysteroscopy (HSC). Methods PubMed and the Cochrane Library were searched by combining keywords 'postpartum hemmorage', 'UA' and 'HSC' to perform a literature review. Articles in French and English with more than five cases of HSC following SPPH‐UA were selected. All cases that had HSC after conservative surgical treatment of SPPH‐UA were collected. A blinded statistical analysis revealed IUAd risk factors. Results 83% of patients agreed to HSC and 38% of 71 cases had an IUAd. Age was not a risk factor (p=0.950). Other factors included multiparity (odds ratio (OR)=1.93, p=0.039), caesarean delivery (OR=3.58, p=0.584) and postpartum infection (OR=3.33, p=0.04). Risk was at 57% after uterine padding with multiple transfixing square stitches (Cho‐technique) (p=0.001), 6% after non‐transfixing uterine folding brace suture (B‐Lynch technique) when used alone, 29% after uterine artery embolization and after internal iliaque artery ligation (OR=0.98, p=645); uterine vascular ligation (OR=0.69, p=0.253) and more than two procedures (OR=0.69, p=2.53). Disparity between authors was observed (p=0.015) and concerned only the surgical techniques used. Conclusion A classification is proposed for deciding post‐SPPH HSC. Further studies are required to determine appropriateness.
obstetrics & gynecology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?