Abstract:The consequences of climate change continue to threaten European forests, particularly for species located at the edges of their latitudinal and altitudinal ranges. While extensively studied in Central Europe, European beech forests require further investigation to understand how climate change will affect these ecosystems in Mediterranean areas. Proposed silvicultural options increasingly aim at sustainable management to reduce biotic and abiotic stresses and enhance these forest ecosystems' resistance and resilience mechanisms. Process-based models (PBMs) can help us to simulate such phenomena and capture early stress signals while considering the effect of different management approaches. In this study, we focus on estimating sensitivity of two state-of-the-art PBMs forest models by simulating carbon and water fluxes at the stand level to assess productivity changes and feedback resulting from different climatic forcings as well as different management regimes. We applied the 3D-CMCC-FEM and MEDFATE forest models for carbon (C) and water (H20) fluxes in in two sites of the Italian peninsula, Cansiglio in the north and Mongiana in the south, under managed vs. unmanaged scenarios and under current climate and different climatic scenarios (RCP4.5 and RCP8.5). To ensure confidence in the modes' resuts, we preliminary evaluated their performance in simulating C and H2O flux in three additional beech forests of the FLUXNET network along a latitudinal gradient spanning from Denmark to central Italy. The 3D-CMCC-FEM model achieved R2 values of 0.83 and 0.86 with RMSEs of 2.53 and 2.05 for C and H20 fluxes, respectively. MEDFATE showed R2 values of 0.76 and 0.69 with RMSEs of 2.54 and 3.01. At the Cansiglio site in northern Italy, both models simulated a general increase in C and H2O fluxes under the RCP8.5 climate scenario compared to the current climate. Still, no benefit in managed plots compared to unmanaged ones, as the site does not have water availability limitations, and thus, competition for water is low. At the Mongiana site in southern Italy, both models predict a decrease in C and H2O fluxes and sensitivity to the different climatic forcing compared to the current climate; and an increase in C and H2O fluxes when considering specific management regimes compared to unmanaged scenarios. Conversely, under unmanaged scenarios plots are simulated to experience first signals of mortality prematurely due to water stress (MEDFATE) and carbon starvation (3D-CMCC-FEM) scenarios. In conclusion, while management interventions may be considered a viable solution for the conservation of beech forests under future climate conditions at moister sites like Cansiglio, in drier sites like Mongiana conservation may not lie in management interventions alone.

Can Forest Management Practices Counteract Species Loss Arising from Increasing European Demand for Forest Biomass under Climate Mitigation Scenarios?

Reconciling the EU forest, biodiversity, and climate strategies

Managing Forests for Biodiversity Conservation and Climate Change Mitigation

Forest Biodiversity, Carbon Sequestration, and Wood Production: Modeling Synergies and Trade-Offs for Ten Forest Landscapes Across Europe

Trade-offs in using European forests to meet climate objectives

Quantifying the impact of key factors on the carbon mitigation potential of managed temperate forests

Assessing the combined effects of forest management and climate change on carbon and water fluxes in European beech forests

A climate-induced tree species bottleneck for forest management in Europe

Effect of forest management choices on carbon sequestration and biodiversity at national scale

Land use strategies to mitigate climate change in carbon dense temperate forests

Mitigation Impact of Different Harvest Scenarios of Finnish Forests That Account for Albedo, Aerosols, and Trade-Offs of Carbon Sequestration and Avoided Emissions

Trade‐offs for climate‐smart forestry in Europe under uncertain future climate

Effect of forest stand management on species composition, structural diversity, and productivity in the temperate zone of Europe

Amount of carbon fixed, transit time and fate of harvested wood products define the climate change mitigation potential of boreal forest management—A model analysis

Silvicultural management in maintaining biodiversity and resistance of forests in Europe-temperate zone

Modeling climate-smart forest management and wood use for climate mitigation potential in Maryland and Pennsylvania

More future synergies and less trade‐offs between forest ecosystem services with natural climate solutions instead of bioeconomy solutions

Actual European forest management by region, tree species and owner based on 714,000 re-measured trees in national forest inventories

Caution needed with the EU forest plantation strategy for offsetting carbon emissions

Adaptive forest management improves stand-level resilience of temperate forests under multiple stressors

Impact of fire and harvest on forest ecosystem services in a species‐rich area in the southern Appalachians