Abstract:Using forests to mitigate climate change has gained much interest in science and policy discussions. We examine the evidence for carbon benefits, environmental and monetary costs, risks and trade-offs for a variety of activities in three general strategies: (1) land use change to increase forest area (afforestation) and avoid deforestation; (2) carbon management in existing forests; and (3) the use of wood as biomass energy, in place of other building materials, or in wood products for carbon storage. We found that many strategies can increase forest sector carbon mitigation above the current 162-256 Tg C/yr, and that many strategies have co-benefits such as biodiversity, water, and economic opportunities. Each strategy also has trade-offs, risks, and uncertainties including possible leakage, permanence, disturbances, and climate change effects. Because approximately 60% of the carbon lost through deforestation and harvesting from 1700 to 1935 has not yet been recovered and because some strategies store carbon in forest products or use biomass energy, the biological potential for forest sector carbon mitigation is large. Several studies suggest that using these strategies could offset as much as 10-20% of current U.S. fossil fuel emissions. To obtain such large offsets in the United States would require a combination of afforesting up to one-third of cropland or pastureland, using the equivalent of about one-half of the gross annual forest growth for biomass energy, or implementing more intensive management to increase forest growth on one-third of forestland. Such large offsets would require substantial trade-offs, such as lower agricultural production and non-carbon ecosystem services from forests. The effectiveness of activities could be diluted by negative leakage effects and increasing disturbance regimes. Because forest carbon loss contributes to increasing climate risk and because climate change may impede regeneration following disturbance, avoiding deforestation and promoting regeneration after disturbance should receive high priority as policy considerations. Policies to encourage programs or projects that influence forest carbon sequestration and offset fossil fuel emissions should also consider major items such as leakage, the cyclical nature of forest growth and regrowth, and the extensive demand for and movement of forest products globally, and other greenhouse gas effects, such as methane and nitrous oxide emissions, and recognize other environmental benefits of forests, such as biodiversity, nutrient management, and watershed protection. Activities that contribute to helping forests adapt to the effects of climate change, and which also complement forest carbon storage strategies, would be prudent.

Land use strategies to mitigate climate change in carbon dense temperate forests

Biophysical considerations in forestry for climate protection

Modeling climate-smart forest management and wood use for climate mitigation potential in Maryland and Pennsylvania

A synthesis of current knowledge on forests and carbon storage in the United States

Forest sector carbon management, measurement and verification, and discussion of policy related to climate change

Creating Strategic Reserves to Protect Forest Carbon and Reduce Biodiversity Losses in the United States

Quantifying the biophysical climate change mitigation potential of Canada's forest sector

Net carbon sequestration implications of intensified timber harvest in Northeastern U.S. forests

Quantifying the Carbon Balance of Forest Restoration and Wildfire under Projected Climate in the Fire-Prone Southwestern US

Assessing the long-term interactions of climate change and timber markets on forest land and carbon storage

Quantifying the impact of key factors on the carbon mitigation potential of managed temperate forests

Modelling the potential of forest management to mitigate climate change in Eastern Canadian forests

Land-use Emissions Play a Critical Role in Land-Based Mitigation for Paris Climate Targets

Climate change mitigation-adaptation relationships in forest management: perspectives from the fire-prone American West

Meeting GHG reduction targets requires accounting for all forest sector emissions

Canadian boreal forests and climate change mitigation

Carbon Benefits from Forest Transitions Promoting Biomass Expansions and Thickening

Costs of forest carbon sequestration in the presence of climate change impacts

Setting Priorities for Land Management to Mitigate Climate Change.

Net carbon accounting and reporting are a barrier to understanding the mitigation value of forest protection in developed countries

A Land Use and Resource Allocation (LURA) modeling system for projecting localized forest CO2 effects of alternative macroeconomic futures