Comparison of Performance in Diagnosis and Characterization of Breast Lesions: Contrast-Enhanced Mammography vs. Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Çağdaş Rıza Açar,Sebnem Orguc

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clbc.2024.04.007

IF: 3.078

2024-04-17

Clinical Breast Cancer

Abstract:Introduction In contemporary medical practice, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is the most sensitive modality for detecting breast cancer. Contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM), a relatively recent technology, represents another contrast-enhanced imaging technique that has the potential to serve as an alternative to breast MRI. Our main goal is to compare the diagnostic accuracy including assessment of sensitivity and specificity of these two contrast-enhanced breast imaging methods, CEM and MRI, in the diagnosis and characterization of breast lesions. Material and Methods Our prospective study included patients who were clinically suspected of malignancy and/or had suspicious findings detected by mammography or ultrasound. A total of 116 patients were included, and both CEM and MRI examinations were performed on all patients. All CEM examinations were conducted at our institution, while 56.89% of all MRI examinations were carried out at external centers. While histopathological results were accessible for all malignant lesions, the final diagnosis for 80.5% of benign lesions was established through typical imaging findings and adequate follow-up. Results This study encompassed a total of 219 lesions, with 125 out of 219 (57.07%) malignant lesions and 94 out of 219 (42.92%) benign lesions. The sensitivity and specificity values were 98.40% and 81.91%, respectively, for CEM, and 100% and 75.33%, respectively, for MRI. Moreover, CEM showcased comparable performance to MRI in evaluating women with dense breasts. Conclusion CEM and MRI were compared for breast lesion diagnosis, with MRI showing higher sensitivity and CEM higher specificity; however, the differences were not statistically significant. Microabstract Our main goal is to compare the performance CEM and MRI, in the diagnosis and characterization of breast lesions. A total of 116 patients were included, and both CEM and MRI examinations were performed on all patients. This study encompassed a total of 219 lesions, with 125 out of 219 (57.07%) being malignant and 94 out of 219 (42.92%) being benign. CEM has comparable diagnostic performance with MRI.

oncology