Abstract:a) Brief description of the objective(s) The aim of this study is to compare contrast-enhanced mammography (CM) with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for preoperative locoregional staging of patients with early-stage breast cancer. b) Material(s) and method(s) Prospective, single-center study, approved by the Research Ethics Committee, which included patients with a histological diagnosis of invasive breast carcinoma, candidates for initial medical treatment. Patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and those in whom the tumor was completely resected in the initial biopsy were excluded. CM and MRI were performed in the week before surgery and the anatomopathological result of the surgical specimen was considered the gold standard. Pearson's modification (r) was used to compare tumor size between different methods. c) Results and discussion Thirty-seven patients were included, with a mean age of 54.5±6.9 years (43-70 years). The mean size of the tumors in pathology was 2.9±1.4 cm (1.1-8.0 cm) and the most common histological type was invasive ductal carcinoma (n=34;87.2%). The clinical stage was IA for 14 patients (37.8%) and IIA for 23 patients (62.2%). The main tumor was identified in 33 cases (89.2%) on conventional mammography and in all cases (100%) on both CM and MRI. There was excellent elasticity between tumor size measured on CM and MRI (r=0.897;p< 0.01). When compared with tumor size in pathology, both methods were adopted in a good way (p< 0.01), however, MRI was functionally superior to CM (r=0.847 vs. 0.683), while mammography conventional showed no therapeutic effect (r=0.222;p=0.21). Multifocal lesions were observed on CM in 2 cases (5.4%) and on MRI in 6 cases (16.2%), with 1 case confirmed as multifocal and the others presenting DCIS associated with the surgical specimen. Suspicious additional lesions were seen in 4 patients (10.8%) on CM and in 3 patients (8.1%) on MRI, of which one was confirmed as malignant in the contralateral breast, which had not been identified in previous exams. d) Conclusions CM showed good adaptability with MRI for assessing tumor size and searching for additional lesions, and may be a cheaper and more accessible alternative for preoperative staging in patients at an early clinical stage. Citation Format: Andressa Amorim, Andre Mattar, Almir Bitencourt, Paula Moraes, Flora Finguerman. CONTRAST MAMMOGRAPHY FOR PREOPERATIVE STAGING OF PATIENTS WITH EARLY BREAST CANCER: PRELIMINARY RESULTS [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl) nr PO5-07-10.

VI.2. Basic functional electrical stimulation (FES) of extremites - an engineer's view.

Contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) versus MRI for breast cancer staging: detection of additional malignant lesions not seen on conventional imaging

Diagnostic Performance of Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography

Contrast Enhancement in Breast Cancer: Magnetic Resonance vs. Mammography: A 10-Year Systematic Review

Comparison of Performance in Diagnosis and Characterization of Breast Lesions: Contrast-Enhanced Mammography vs. Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Comparative Evaluation of Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Diagnosing and Treating Breast Cancer

Contrast-enhanced mammography versus breast MRI in the assessment of multifocal and multicentric breast cancer: a retrospective study

Preoperative Staging in Breast Cancer: Intraindividual Comparison of Unenhanced MRI Combined With Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Dynamic Contrast Enhanced-MRI

Contrast-enhanced breast imaging: Current status and future challenges

Comparison of background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) on contrast-enhanced cone-beam breast CT (CE-CBBCT) and breast MRI

Contrast‐enhanced mammography improves patient access to functional breast imaging

Contrast-Enhanced Mammogram: A New Game-Changer in Breast Imaging. Indications with Case-Based Experience

Pilot study: A simple CAD-based tool to detect breast cancer on MRI of the breast

Abstract PO5-07-10: CONTRAST MAMMOGRAPHY FOR PREOPERATIVE STAGING OF PATIENTS WITH EARLY BREAST CANCER: PRELIMINARY RESULTS

Accuracy of Preoperative Contrast-enhanced Cone Beam Breast CT in Assessment of Residual Tumor after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Comparative Study with Breast MRI

How Dual-Energy Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography Can Provide Useful Clinical Information About Prognostic Factors in Breast Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review of Literature

Contrast-Enhanced Cone-Beam Breast CT: An Analysis of Diagnostic Value in Predicting Breast Lesion With Rim Enhancement Malignancy

Impact of background parenchymal enhancement levels on the diagnosis of contrast-enhanced digital mammography in evaluations of breast cancer: comparison with contrast-enhanced breast MRI

Head-to-head comparison of contrast-enhanced mammography and contrast-enhanced MRI for assessing pathological complete response to neoadjuvant therapy in patients with breast cancer: a meta-analysis

Discrimination Between Benign and Malignant Lesions With Restriction Spectrum Imaging MRI in an Enriched Breast Cancer Screening Cohort

Genetic determination of lipopolysaccharide: locus of O-specific unit polymerase in group E of salmonella.