Abstract:Critical micelle concentration (CMC) is the main chemical–physical parameter to be determined for pure surfactants for their characterization in terms of surface activity and self-assembled aggregation. The CMC values can be calculated from different techniques (e.g., tensiometry, conductivity, fluorescence spectroscopy), able to follow the variation of a physical property with surfactant concentrations. Different mathematical approaches have been applied for the determination of CMC values from the raw experimental data. Most of them are independent of the operator, despite not all of the fitting procedures employed so far can be applied in all techniques. In this experimental work, the second derivative of the experimental data has been proposed as a unique approach to determine the CMC values from different techniques (tensiometry, conductimetry, densimetry, spectrofluorimetry, and high-resolution ultrasound spectroscopy). To this end, the CMC values of five different surfactants, specifically three anionic (sodium dodecyl sulfate, sodium deoxycolate, and N-lauroyl sarcosinate) and two nonionic, such as polyethylene glycol ester surfactants [polyethylenglicol (8) monostearate and polyethylenglicol (8) monolaurate], have been determined by this approach. The "second-derivate" approach provides a reliable determination of the CMC values among all of the techniques investigated, which were comparable to those calculated by the other operator-free routinely methods employed, such as segmental linear regression or Boltzmann regression. This study also highlighted the strengths and shortcomings of each technique over the others, providing an overview of the CMC values of commonly used anionic and nonionic surfactants in the pharmaceutical field, determined by employing different experimental approaches.The Supporting Information is available free of charge at <a class="ext-link" href="/doi/10.1021/acs.langmuir.0c00420?goto=supporting-info">https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.langmuir.0c00420</a>.ESI mass spectra of all surfactants; DSC traces for all surfactants; conductivity vs concentration plot for the anionic surfactants; sound speed vs concentration plot for the PEG8-L surfactant; CMC values calculated by the segmental linear regression method for all surfactants according to the different techniques used and the CMC values calculated by the Boltzmann nonlinear fitting of fluorescence raw data; and fluorescence intensity (peak I/III) vs concentration plots for all surfactants (<a class="ext-link" href="/doi/suppl/10.1021/acs.langmuir.0c00420/suppl_file/la0c00420_si_001.pdf">PDF</a>)This article has not yet been cited by other publications.

Computational prediction of the critical micelle concentration (CMC) of surfactants using the non-Bornian solvation model

Structure-based modeling of critical micelle concentration (CMC) of anionic surfactants in brine using intelligent methods

Quantitative Structure-Property Relationships of Surfactants: Prediction of the Critical Micelle Concentration of Nonionic Surfactants

Quantifying the Critical Micelle Concentration of Nonionic and Ionic Surfactants by Self-Consistent Field Theory

Surface tension model for surfactant solutions at the critical micelle concentration

Ionic surfactants critical micelle concentration prediction in water/organic solvent mixtures by artificial neural network

Determining interfacial tension and critical micelle concentrations of surfactants from atomistic molecular simulations

Model for estimating activity coefficients in binary and ternary ionic surfactant solutions

Surfactant Self-Assembling and Critical Micelle Concentration: One Approach Fits All?

Molecular dynamics study of the effect of inorganic salts on the monolayer of four surfactants at the oil/water interface

CMCo of Nonylphenol Polyoxyethylene Ethers in Oil Phases and the Problems Concerned

Critical Micellar Concentrations of Quaternary Ammonium Surfactants with Hydroxyethyl Substituents on Headgroups Determined by Isothermal Titration Calorimetry

Molecular thermodynamic modeling of specific ion effects on micellization of ionic surfactants

Micellization Thermodynamic Behavior of Gemini Cationic Surfactants. Modeling its Adsorption at Air/Water Interface

Predicting the Temperature Dependence of Surfactant CMCs Using Graph Neural Networks

Exploration of the Adsorption Kinetics of Surfactants at the Water–Oil Interface via Grand-Canonical Molecular Dynamics Simulations

A theoretical investigation of the influence of the second critical micelle concentration on the solubilization capacity of surfactant micelles

Ion Specificity and Micellization of Ionic Surfactants: A Monte Carlo Study

QSPR for the prediction of critical micelle concentration of different classes of surfactants using machine learning algorithms

Multi-scale Times and Modes of Fast and Slow Relaxation in Solutions with Coexisting Spherical and Cylindrical Micelles according to the Difference Becker-Doering Kinetic Equations