Experimental and numerical model of anisotropic permeability and CO2 injectivity of coal during CO2 enhanced coalbed methane recovery process

Qinghe Niu,Mingwei Hu,Bing Leng,Xiang He,Wenjie Su,Wei Wang,Qizhi Wang,Jiangfang Chang,Zhongmin Ji,Xiaofei Qi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2022.1042477
IF: 2.9
2023-01-20
Frontiers in Earth Science
Abstract:Guaranteeing CO 2 injectivity has been the precondition for implementing the CO 2 -enhanced coalbed methane recovery (CO 2 -ECBM), however, it dramatically decreases during the CO 2 injection process because it is influenced by the dynamic change of the anisotropic permeability of coal. To reveal and evaluate the CO 2 injectivity of coal, the anisotropic permeability test and the CO 2 injectivity simulation test were first conducted, then the corresponding numerical models were established and verified by the experimental data. The results show that the permeability of coal in parallel face cleat direction is the largest, followed by the permeability of coal in parallel butt cleat direction and that in vertical bedding direction is the minimum. The peak value of the instantaneous injectivity rate is enhanced and the injection time is prolonged with the increase of the CO 2 injection pressure. The total CO 2 injectivity rate is nonlinearly increased from 13.61 to 311.87 cm 2 /MPa min when the CO 2 injection pressure raises from 2 to 10 MPa. The anisotropic permeability model is appropriate to describe the dynamic evolution of permeability under different boundary conditions, the CO 2 injectivity prediction model can be used to evaluate the CO 2 injectivity during the CO 2 injection process. Increasing the CO 2 injection pressure may temporarily promote CO 2 injectivity, while the CO 2 injection increment is limited. The CO 2 fracturing by phase transition may be an available reservoir stimulation method for enhancing the CO 2 injection and should be focused on in the future.
geosciences, multidisciplinary
What problem does this paper attempt to address?