Abstract:The analysis of morphology is crucial to the study of phylogeny in many ancient and modern organismal groups. Recently a number of arguments have been made in favor of regarding certain kinds of morphometric variables as putatively homologous characters and allowing them to participate, along with other non-morphometric variables, in parsimony-based cladistic analyses. These arguments rest on the assumptions that geometric landmarks incorporate the concept of biological homology and that partial warp and principal warp morphometric variables uniquely incorporate and operationalize the concept of spatial localization, thus providing investigators with the ability to assess patterns and directions of geometrical variation in unmeasured regions of organic forms. Literature review, coupled with empirical investigations of similarities and differences among three different morphometric data analysis methods on two different datasets suggest that there is no support for these assertions. Geometric landmarks, which form the basis for all morphometric measurements and latent shape variables, have no necessary correspondence to biological homology. Partial warp variables, coordinate-point eigenshape variables, and inter-landmark distance-based singular vector shape-change variables all express localized (= regionally-weighted) geometric deformations. However, none of these deformation patterns are localized in the sense of being truly independent from globally-distributed aspects of shape change. All three of the morphometric data analysis methods investigated are capable of inferring patterns of shape change in remote regions of the form so long as a spatially adequate array of landmarks is used as the basis for the shape analysis. Based on these results it is concluded that: (1) all types of morphometric procedures are potentially useful in phylogenetic inference to the extent that they are able to summarize patterns of biotic shape change within the Euclidean space of the original measurements; (2) morphometric interpretations are strengthened by using alternative analytic approaches to probe the geometric system in a hypothetico-deductive manner and achieve a robust and consistent interpretation of underlying differences among operational taxonomic units (OTU s); and (3) while deformation- based morphometric variables can be used to analyze the distribution of organic shapes in a variety of measurement and latent variable spaces, they represent abstract investigative tools that are tied irreducibly to particular samples and data. Such variables can be used to study morphological characters, refine character and character state definitions, and aid in the assignment of character states to OTU s. However, they are not characters themselves and may not be suitable for phylogenetic analyses directly. In addition, a new morphometric data analysis technique coordinate-point eigenshape analysis is described and its use illustrated.

A landmarking protocol for geometric morphometric analysis of squamate endocasts

Assessing the application of landmark-free morphometrics to macroevolutionary analyses

Landmark detection in 2D bioimages for geometric morphometrics: a multi-resolution tree-based approach

A Registration and Deep Learning Approach to Automated Landmark Detection for Geometric Morphometrics

Leveraging Descriptor Learning and Functional Map-based Shape Matching for Automatic Landmark Acquisition

Is shape in the eye of the beholder? Assessing landmarking error in geometric morphometric analyses on live fish

New Insights into Geometric Morphometry Applied to Fish Scales for Species Identification

A landmark-free morphometrics pipeline: Application to characterise a Down syndrome model skull phenotype

The promise of geometric morphometrics

A Comparison of Semilandmarking Approaches in the Visualisation of Shape Differences

Thirty years of geometric morphometrics: Achievements, challenges, and the ongoing quest for biological meaningfulness

Obtaining new resolutions in carnivore tooth pit morphological analyses: A methodological update for digital taphonomy

Use of Landmark and Outline Morphometrics to Investigate Thecal Form Variation in Crushed Gogiid Echinoderms

Talking heads: disentangling the shape changes of the large extant hippopotamus during its ontogenetic development

Landmark methods for forms without landmarks: morphometrics of group differences in outline shape

Landmark-Based Geometric Morphometrics: What Fish Shapes Can Tell Us about Fish Evolution

Geometric morphometric analysis of Pleuronectiformes vertebrae: A new tool to identify archaeological fish remains?

LANDMARKS, LOCALIZATION AND THE USE OF MORPHOMETRICS IN PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSIS

Gaussian Process Landmarking for Three-Dimensional Geometric Morphometrics

Sorting the mob: using geometric morphometrics and machine learning to differentiate kangaroo postcrania for zooarchaeological applications

Testing repeatability, measurement error and species differentiation when using geometric morphometrics on complex shapes: a case study of Patagonian lizards of the genus Liolaemus (Squamata: Liolaemini)