Assessing the application of landmark-free morphometrics to macroevolutionary analyses

James M. Mulqueeney,Thomas H. G. Ezard,Anjali Goswami
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.04.24.590959
2024-04-28
Abstract:The study of phenotypic evolution has been transformed by methods allowing three-dimensional quantification of anatomical form. The present state-of-the-art 3D geometric morphometrics, which relies heavily on manual landmarking, is time-consuming, prone to operator bias, and cannot effectively compare disparate shapes. Emerging automated approaches, notably landmark-free techniques, offer promise but have only been applied to closely related species. Here, we compare landmark-free approaches with high-density geometric morphometric methods on 322 mammals across 180 families. Leveraging the benefits of Poisson meshes, which combine open and closed projections, we show how landmark-free methods have greater power to differentiate major taxonomic groups. Although there is coarse correspondence in shape variation between the two methods, the finer features of the landmark-free approach likely reflect its broader sampling of the surface structure. Our study underscores the robustness of landmark-free methods for large-scale comparative analysis and helps propel morphometrics into a new era of bigger data.
Evolutionary Biology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
### Problems the Paper Aims to Solve This paper aims to explore and evaluate the potential application of landmark-free morphometric methods in macroevolutionary analysis. Specifically, the research team compared the performance of landmark-free methods with traditional manual landmark methods on a large-scale mammalian dataset. #### Main Issues: 1. **Improving Morphological Analysis Efficiency**: Existing geometric morphometric methods based on manual landmarks are time-consuming and susceptible to operator bias. Landmark-free methods can improve analysis speed and reproducibility. 2. **Overcoming Homology Constraints**: Manual landmark methods require the identification of homologous points, which becomes challenging when comparing significantly different species. Landmark-free methods do not rely on homologous points, thus better handling morphological comparisons across different taxa. 3. **Large-Scale Data Analysis Capability**: With the development of high-resolution imaging technologies, large 3D image databases have been established, creating an urgent need to develop new software and methods to efficiently process these data. #### Methods and Findings: - The researchers used the Deterministic Atlas Analysis (DAA) method and applied it to a cranial dataset of 322 placental mammals. - Results showed that the DAA method outperformed traditional manual landmark methods in terms of morphological coverage, analysis speed, and accuracy, especially when dealing with diverse datasets. - By standardizing the Poisson mesh, the researchers addressed differences between various types of scan data (such as surface scans and CT scans), further enhancing the consistency and reliability of the results. In summary, this study demonstrates the significant potential of landmark-free methods in the field of morphometrics, contributing to the advancement of the field towards the "big data" era.