Bioelectronic microfluidic wound healing: a platform for investigating direct current stimulation of injured cell collectives

Sebastian Shaner,Anna Savelyeva,Anja Kvartuh,Nicole Jedrusik,Lukas Matter,José Leal,Maria Asplund
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/d2lc01045c
2023-01-19
Lab on a Chip - Miniaturisation for Chemistry and Biology
Abstract:Upon cutaneous injury, the human body naturally forms an electric field (EF) that acts as a guidance cue for relevant cellular and tissue repair and reorganization. However, the direct current (DC) flow imparted by this EF can be impacted by a variety of diseases. This work delves into the impact of DC stimulation on both healthy and diabetic in vitro wound healing models of human keratinocytes, the most prevalent cell type of the skin. The culmination of non-metal electrode materials and prudent microfluidic design allowed us to create a compact bioelectronic platform to study the effects of different sustained (12 hours galvanostatic DC) EF configurations on wound closure dynamics. Specifically, we compared if electrotactically closing a wound's gap from one wound edge (i.e., uni-directional EF) is as effective as compared to alternatively polarizing both wound's edges (i.e., pseudo-converging EF) as both of these spatial stimulation strategies are fundamental to eventual translational electrode design and strategy. We found that uni-directional electric guidance cues were superior in group keratinocyte healing dynamics by enhancing wound closure rate nearly three-fold for both healthy and diabetic-like keratinocyte collectives, compared to their non-stimulated respective controls. The motility-inhibited and diabetic-like keratinocytes regained wound closure rates with uni-directional electrical stimulation (increase from 1.0 to 2.8 % hr^−1) comparable to healthy non-stimulated keratinocyte counterparts (3.5 % hr^−1). Our results help in providing hope that electrical stimulation delivered in a controlled manner can be a viable pathway to accelerate wound repair, also by providing a baseline for other researchers trying to find an optimal electrode blueprint for in vivo DC stimulation
What problem does this paper attempt to address?