Development of a stereo-EEG based seizure matching system for clinical decision making in epilepsy surgery

John Thomas,Chifaou Abdallah,Kassem Jaber,Mays Khweileh,Olivier Aron,Irena Dolezalova,Vadym Gnatkovsky,Daniel Mansilla,Paivi Nevalainen,Raluca Pana,Stephan Schuele,Jaysingh Singh,Ana Suller-Marti,Alexandra Urban,Jeff Hall,François Dubeau,Louis Maillard,Philippe Kahane,Jean Gotman,Birgit Frauscher
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2552/ad7323
IF: 5.043
2024-08-26
Journal of Neural Engineering
Abstract:Objective: The proportion of patients becoming seizure-free after epilepsy surgery has stagnated. Large multi-center stereo-electroencephalography datasets can allow comparing new patients to past similar cases and making clinical decisions with the knowledge of how cases were treated in the past. However, the complexity of these evaluations makes the manual search for similar patients impractical. We aim to develop an automated system that electrographically and anatomically matches seizures to those in a database. Additionally, since features that define seizure similarity are unknown, we evaluate the agreement and features among experts in classifying similarity. Approach: We utilized 320 stereo-electroencephalography seizures from 95 consecutive patients who underwent epilepsy surgery. Eight international experts evaluated seizure-pair similarity using a four-level similarity score. As our primary outcome, we developed and validated an automated seizure matching system by employing patient data marked by independent experts. Secondary outcomes included the inter-rater agreement and features for classifying seizure similarity. Main results: The seizure matching system achieved a median area-under-the-curve of 0.76 (interquartile range, 0.1), indicating its feasibility. Six distinct seizure similarity features were identified and proved effective: onset region, onset pattern, propagation region, duration, extent of spread, and propagation speed. Among these features, the onset region showed the strongest correlation with expert scores (Spearman's rho=0.75, p<0.001). Additionally, the moderate inter-rater agreement confirmed the practicality of our approach with an agreement of 73.9% (7%), and Gwet's kappa of 0.45 (0.16). Further, the interoperability of the system was validated on seizures from five centers. Significance: We demonstrated the feasibility and validity of a stereo-electroencephalography seizure matching system across patients, effectively mirroring the expertise of epileptologists. This novel system can identify patients with seizures similar to that of a patient being evaluated, thus optimizing the treatment plan by considering the results of treating similar patients in the past, potentially improving surgery outcome.
engineering, biomedical,neurosciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?