Revisiting the "East African Paradox": CMIP6 models also struggle to reproduce strong observed Long Rain drying trends

Kevin Schwarzwald,Richard Seager
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1175/jcli-d-24-0225.1
IF: 5.38
2024-09-15
Journal of Climate
Abstract:Societies in much of the Horn of Africa are affected by variability in two distinct rainy seasons: the March-May (MAM) "long" rains and the October-December (OND) "short" rains. A recent 5-season, La Niña-forced drought has renewed concerns about possible anthropogenic drying trends in the long rains, which had partially recovered after a multidecadal drying trend in the 1980s through 2000s. Despite observed drying, previous generations of global climate models (GCMs) have consistently projected long-term wetting due to increased greenhouse gas concentrations, an East African "Paradox" which complicates the interpretation of East African rainfall projections. We investigate the Paradox in new CMIP6 and seasonal forecast models, leveraging an improved observational record and Large Ensembles to better differentiate internal and forced trends. We find observed drying trends are at the limits of the GCM spread during the peak Paradox period, though the recent recovery is comfortably within the model spread. We find that the apparent Paradox is largely removed by prescribing sea surface temperatures (SSTs), and is likely caused by the GCM difficulties in simulating observed tropical Pacific SST trends in recent decades. In line with arguments that these SST trends are at least partially forced anthropogenically, we recommend users of future rainfall projections in East Africa consider the possibility of long-term MAM drying despite GCM wetting, and call for future model simulations that better sample the expected spread of SSTs.
meteorology & atmospheric sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?