Abstract:Background: Magnetic resonance imaging provides noninvasive tools to investigate alcohol use disorder (AUD) and nicotine use disorder (NUD) and neural phenotypes for genetic studies. A data-driven transdiagnostic approach could provide a new perspective on the neurobiology of AUD and NUD. Methods: Using samples of individuals with AUD (n = 140), individuals with NUD (n = 249), and healthy control participants (n = 461) from the UK Biobank, we integrated clinical, neuroimaging, and genetic markers to identify biotypes of AUD and NUD. We partitioned participants with AUD and NUD based on resting-state functional connectivity (FC) features associated with clinical metrics. A multitask artificial neural network was trained to evaluate the cluster-defined biotypes and jointly infer AUD and NUD diagnoses. Results: Three biotypes-primary NUD, mixed NUD/AUD with depression and anxiety, and mixed AUD/NUD-were identified. Multitask classifiers incorporating biotype knowledge achieved higher area under the curve (AUD: 0.76, NUD: 0.74) than single-task classifiers without biotype differentiation (AUD: 0.61, NUD: 0.64). Cerebellar FC features were important in distinguishing the 3 biotypes. The biotype of mixed NUD/AUD with depression and anxiety demonstrated the largest number of FC features (n = 5), all related to the visual cortex, that significantly differed from healthy control participants and were validated in a replication sample (p < .05). A polymorphism in TNRC6A was associated with the mixed AUD/NUD biotype in both the discovery (p = 7.3 × 10-5) and replication (p = 4.2 × 10-2) sets. Conclusions: Biotyping and multitask learning using FC features can characterize the clinical and genetic profiles of AUD and NUD and help identify cerebellar and visual circuit markers to differentiate the AUD/NUD group from the healthy control group. These markers support a new growing body of literature.

Types of alcoholics: concurrent and predictive validity of some common classification schemes

Types of alcoholics, I: Evidence for an empirically derived typology based on indicators of vulnerability and severity

Alcoholic typologies: Historical evolution and empirical evaluation of some common classification schemes

The type A/type B distinction. Subtyping alcoholics according to indicators of vulnerability and severity.

Types of alcoholics, II: application of an empirically derived typology to treatment matching

The classification of alcoholics: Typology theories from the 19th century to the present

Typologies in alcoholism: An overview

Classification and forms of inebriety: Historical antecedents of alcoholic typologies

Subtypes for classifying adolescents with marijuana use disorders: construct validity and clinical implications

Subtypes of cocaine abusers: Support for a Type A–Type B distinction.

Subtypes of alcoholism and their role in therapy

Subtypes of substance dependence and abuse: implications for diagnostic classification and empirical research

Introduction: Method and Theory in the Classification of Alcoholicsa

Insights from genetically stratified analyses comparing subtypes of alcohol misuse

Psychopathology as a predictor of treatment outcome in alcoholics

“Never believe an alcoholic”? On the validity of self-report measures of alcohol dependence and related constructs

Unitary versus multidimensional models of alcoholism treatment outcome: an empirical study.

Platelet MAO activity as a biological marker in subgroups of alcoholism

Alcohol-Dependent Subjects Show Different Personality Traits Compared With Subjects With Multiple Substance Dependence: Preliminary Data

Machine Learning of Functional Connectivity to Biotype Alcohol and Nicotine Use Disorders

The nature of alcoholism in patients with different family histories for alcoholism.