Abstract:Objectives: To determine whether prosocial rule-breaking exists as a separate construct from antisocial rule-breaking and to develop a valid rule-breaking scale with prosocial and antisocial subscales. Hypotheses: We hypothesized that (a) rule-breaking would have prosocial and antisocial subfactors; (b) the prosocial rule-breaking subscale would positively associate with prosocial intentions, empathy, moral identity, and guilt proneness, whereas the antisocial rule-breaking subscale would negatively associate with these same factors; and (c) the two subscales would predict prosocial and antisocial cheating behaviors, respectively. Method: We developed the Prosocial and Antisocial Rule-Breaking (PARB) scale using a sample of 497 undergraduates (Study 1) and 257 Amazon Mechanical Turk workers (Study 2). Participants completed all surveys (Studies 1 and 2) and took part in a between-subjects experiment (Study 2) in which cheating behavior was measured in two conditions—when cheating helps others (prosocial) or oneself (antisocial). Results: The final PARB scale demonstrated the expected factor structure (comparative fit index = .96, Tucker–Lewis index = .93, root-mean-square error of approximation = .064; χ2 = 177, df = 88, p < .001), with the prosocial (α = .81) and antisocial (α = .93) subscales showing good reliability. Prosocial rule-breaking was positively associated with prosocial intentions, empathy, and guilt proneness, whereas antisocial rule-breaking was negatively associated with these same factors. Each additional point in prosocial rule-breaking PARB score predicted a 37% increased likelihood of participating in protest behavior in an exploratory investigation (p = .025) and predicted a 268% increase in actual prosocial cheating behavior (p < .001) but did not predict antisocial cheating behavior (p = .293). Conversely, each additional point in antisocial rule-breaking PARB score did not predict protest participation (p = .410) but did predict a 69% increase in actual antisocial cheating behavior (p = .025). Conclusions: These findings suggest that our current understanding of rule-breaking is limited, as many types of rule-breaking are prosocially motivated and are not necessarily antisocial. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved)

When and why does prosocial rule-breaking behavior fall into dilemma? A moral balancing perspective

Turning a Blind Eye to Team Members’ Unethical Behavior: the Role of Reward Systems

Why Does Counterproductive Work Behavior Lead to Pro-Social Rule Breaking? the Roles of Impression Management Motives and Leader-Liking

Violation with Concerns of Safety: A Study on Non-Compliant Behavior and the Antecedent and Consequent Effects in Power Grid Construction

Beyond Risk-Taking

Prosocial rule-breaking: a systematic literature review

Why Good Employees Do Bad Things: the Link Between Pro-Environmental Behavior and Workplace Deviance

Examining the dynamics of pro-social rule-breaking among grassroots public servants

Performance Goal Orientation and Unethical Pro-Organizational Behavior: a Moderated Mediation Model

Research on the moral slippery slope risk of unethical pro-organizational behavior and its mechanism: a moderated mediation model

Can proactively confessing obtain your embrace? Exploring for leader's pro-social rule-breaking consequences based on a self-verification perspective

Corporate Hypocrisy And Counterproductive Work Behavior: A Moderated Mediation Model Of Organizational Identification And Perceived Importance Of Csr

When Moral Tension Begets Cognitive Dissonance: An Investigation of Responses to Unethical Pro-Organizational Behavior and the Contingent Effect of Construal Level

Research on the consequences of employees' unethical pro-organizational behavior: The moderating role of moral identity

Breaking rules for moral reasons: Development and validation of the Prosocial and Antisocial Rule-Breaking (PARB) scale.

When morality matters: impact of socially responsible human resource management on unethical behavior

Repaying the Debt: An Examination of the Relationship between Perceived Organizational Support and Unethical Pro-organizational Behavior by Low Performers

From Good Soldiers to Psychologically Entitled: Examining when and Why Citizenship Behavior Leads to Deviance

Turning Good Soldiers into Bad Apples: Examining when and Why Citizenship Behavior Leads to Deviance

A Moral Cleansing Process: How and when Does Unethical Pro-organizational Behavior Increase Prohibitive and Promotive Voice

Moral decline in the workplace: unethical pro-organizational behavior, psychological entitlement, and leader gratitude expression