Relationships Between Listening and Speaking in Online Discussions: an Empirical Investigation.
Alyssa Friend Wise,Simone Nicole Hausknecht,Yuting Zhao
2013-01-01
Abstract:This study investigated relationships between how students “listen” (access existing posts) and “speak” (contribute posts) in asynchronous online discussions. Ten variables indexing four dimensions of students’ listening (breadth, depth, temporal contiguity and revisitation) and five variables indexing three dimensions of students’ speaking (discursiveness, depth of content and reflectivity) were calculated for 31 students participating in six week-long online discussions as part of an undergraduate educational psychology course. Multi-level mixed-model linear regressions indicated that responsiveness of students’ posts was positively predicted by how often they revisited previously read peer posts, and negatively related to a greater number of posts in the discussion overall. Post content quality was predicted by the percentage of posts viewed that students actually read (as opposed to scan). Put together, results suggest that when students take the time to read and re-read their peers’ posts there are related benefits in the quality of the posts they contribute. Introduction Asynchronous discussions are often seen as a powerful venue for knowledge construction due to their affordances for thoughtful commentary and reflective responses (Lipponen, 2002). The core premise is that learners build their ideas collectively and individually through dialogue; thus well-designed and supported online discussions can contribute to learning. Various mechanisms have been proposed to explain such learning including articulating one’s ideas, receiving feedback on these, socio-cognitive conflict caused by exposure to divergent views, the taking of multiple perspectives into account, and the internalization of collaborative activity (Stahl 2005; Lipponen, 2002). In common, all depend on two basic interrelated processes that learners must engage in: “speaking” (contributing posts to the discussion); and “listening” (accessing existing posts) [Wise et al., 2013]. When learning discussions are truly collaborative, these two activities are intimately related and inform each other. In contrast, if learners do not attend to others’ posts (or do so in an incoherent way) the “discussion” that results is more akin to a series of parallel monologues, explaining the findings of shallow and disjointed conversations noted by various researchers (e.g. Thomas, 2002; Webb et al 2004). Previous research has informed our understanding about the ways in which learners engage in the activities of speaking and listening in online discussions (e.g. Pena-Shaff & Nicholls, 2004; Hewitt, 2003; Ho & Swan, 2007; Wise et al., 2013) but heretofore not connected the two. This is important because the interrelationship (or lack thereof) between the activities of speaking and listening may be an important factor contributing to the extent to which asynchronous discussions live up to or fall short of their possibilities for supporting knowledge construction. In this study we bridge this gap by examining how students’ listening and speaking behaviors relate to each other. This work connects to the conference theme of learning across levels as the interdependent processes of individuals within the context of groups are examined over time. Theoretical Framework While the metaphorical language of speaking and listening refers to real-time spoken conversations; in online discussions these activities take a different form. In “listening” learners engage with the text-based expressions of others’ ideas at their discretion and on their own timeline (Jonassen & Kwon, 2001); in “speaking” they exercise decisive control over the timeline for composing their thoughts, and when and where in the conversation they contribute. This temporal flexibility and decoupling of participation timelines changes the dynamics of discussions, allowing time for reflection and the opportunity to revisit comments already “heard,” but also creating challenges for managing discussions that proliferate in one’s absence (Lipponen, 2002; Peters & Hewitt, 2010). New categories with which to characterize these behaviors also emerge. Conceptualizing Dimensions of “Listening” in Online Discussions Previous work (Wise et al., 2012a; 2012c; 2013) has conceptualized different dimensions to characterize the ways in which students attend to the posts of others and has explored different approaches students take in such online listening. At a basic level, students can differ in the breadth and depth with which they view their classmate’s contributions. The breadth with which students attend to others’ posts is important in terms of the diversity of ideas that they are exposed to and their ability to respond to the discussion as a whole, while the depth with which they attend to these posts is an indication of the degree to which they are considering others’ CSCL 2013 Proceedings Volume 1: Full Papers & Symposia