Spectral Fidelity of Earth's Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecosystems

David R. Thompson,Philip G. Brodrick,Kerry Cawse‐Nicholson,K. Dana Chadwick,Robert O. Green,Benjamin Poulter,Shawn Serbin,Alexey N. Shiklomanov,Philip A. Townsend,Kevin R. Turpie,Alexey Shiklomanov,Philip Townsend,Kevin Turpie
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JG006273
2021-07-30
Abstract:The Surface Biology and Geology (SBG) investigation will create global maps of spectral surface reflectance and emissivity at a cadence of 16 days or better, with coverage to address global questions about Earth's geology, cryosphere and ecosystems. The revolutionary potential poses a commensurate challenge: creating contiguous maps free from regional biases induced by atmosphere, observation geometry, or inversion error. This will require an accurate calibration with precise knowledge of each channel's spectral response. Here we quantify the impact of spectral calibration on SBG's aquatic and terrestrial ecosystem objectives. We find that contemporary algorithms for ecosystem trait retrieval demand more accurate spectral calibration than historical missions. Errors due to drift or spatial nonuniformity in the wavelength calibration that have previously been considered acceptable can cause systematic errors larger than the instrument noise and of the same order as the variability SBG aims to measure. Moreover, their impact on atmospheric correction can induce climate-dependent systematic errors that thwart comparisons between ecosystems. These results underscore the importance of spectral response accuracy in SBG mission design.
environmental sciences,geosciences, multidisciplinary
What problem does this paper attempt to address?