Implicit Bias and Health Disparities Education in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit
Nicolle Fernández Dyess,Cara Beth Carr,Stephanie C. Mavis,Catherine G. Caruso,Susan Izatt,Heather French,Rita Dadiz,Elizabeth M. Bonachea,Megan M. Gray
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2240-1979
2024-02-08
American Journal of Perinatology
Abstract:Objective This study aimed to characterize implicit bias (IB) and health disparities (HD) education in neonatal–perinatal medicine (NPM), including current educational opportunities, resources, and barriers. Study Design A national web-based survey was sent to NPM fellows, neonatologists, and frontline providers after iterative review by education experts from the National Neonatology Curriculum Committee. Quantitative data were analyzed with chi-square and Fisher's exact tests. Qualitative data were evaluated using thematic analysis. Results Of the 452 NPM survey respondents, most desired additional IB (76%) and HD (83%) education. A greater proportion of neonatologists than fellows received IB (83 vs. 57%) and HD (87 vs. 74%) education. Only 41% of neonatologists reported that their institution requires IB training. A greater proportion of fellows than neonatologists expressed dissatisfaction with the current approaches for IB (51 vs. 25%, p < 0.001) and HD (43 vs. 25%, p = 0.015) education. The leading drivers of dissatisfaction included insufficient time spent on the topics, lack of specificity to NPM, inadequate curricular scope or depth, and lack of local educator expertise. A minority of faculty who were tasked to educate others have received specific educator training on IB (21%) and HD (16%). Thematic analysis of survey free-text responses identified three main themes on the facilitators and barriers to successful IB and HD education: individual , environmental , and curricular design variables . Conclusion NPM trainees and neonatologists desire tailored, active, and expert-guided IB and HD education. Identified barriers are important to address in developing an effective IB/HD curriculum for the NPM community. Key Points There is a gap between the current delivery of IB/HD education and the needs of the NPM community. NPM trainees and neonatologists desire tailored, active, and expert-guided IB and HD education. A successful curriculum should be widely accessible, NPM-specific, and include facilitator training. The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. N.F.D. and C.B.C. contributed to the methodology, investigation, data curation, visualization, formal analysis, and writing (of the original draft) of the study. As corresponding author, N.F.D. has full access to the data in the study and final responsibility for the decision to submit for publication. S.C.M. and C.G.C. contributed to the study's methodology, investigation, formal analysis, and writing (review and editing). S.I., H.F., R.D., and E.M.B. contributed to the study's conceptualization, methodology, review, and editing. M.M.G. contributed to the study's conceptualization, methodology, supervision, formal analysis, and writing (review and editing). All authors approved the final manuscript as submitted and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work. * These authors contributed equally to this work as cofirst authors. Received: 04 November 2023 Accepted: 05 January 2024 Accepted Manuscript online: 08 January 2024 Article published online: 06 February 2024 © 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved. Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc. 333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA
pediatrics,obstetrics & gynecology