Societal Discrimination, Vigilance, and Patient‐Provider Relationships Among Perinatal Women: A Mixed Methods Study

Katherine I. Tierney,Ellen Wagenfeld‐Heintz,Cynthia Bane,Silvia Linares,Megan Sandberg,Drew Moss,Abby Duerst,Claudia Walters,Terra Bautista,Lynette Gumbleton,Catherine L. Kothari
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jmwh.13700
2024-10-21
Abstract:Introduction In the United States, maternal mortality is high and patterned by race and socioeconomic status (SES). Patient‐provider relationships and societal discrimination have been separately associated with poor maternal outcomes, but it is not clear how such mechanisms may be interrelated. Thus, the present study investigates how societal experiences of discrimination are associated with and manifest in patient‐provider relationship quality among perinatal women. Methods The study uses a mixed methods design with an explanatory‐sequential approach. First, a path analysis using structural equation modeling of a cross‐sectional representative survey of 244 perinatal women in Kalamazoo County, Michigan, was conducted. Second, a thematic qualitative analysis was conducted of focus groups composed of survey participants (n = 34). Results In the quantitative analyses, race and SES were associated with experiences of societal discrimination in the expected directions (race: b, 1.87; SE, 0.58; P = .001; SES: b, 2.18; SE, 0.60; P
nursing
What problem does this paper attempt to address?