Abstract:Purpose: To compare the short-term efficacy between natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE) without abdominal incision and conventional laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of sigmoid colon cancer and upper rectal cancer. Methods: A total of 86 patients scheduled to undergo laparoscope-assisted radical surgery of sigmoid cancer or upper rectal cancer from January 2015 to September 2017 (T1-3 stages in preoperative imaging evaluation, no distant metastasis, and body mass index <28 kg/m2) were selected and randomly divided into the NOSE group (no abdominal incision, n=43) and conventional laparoscopy group (LA group, n=43). The operation time, amount of intraoperative bleeding, postoperative exhaust time, postoperative diet time, postoperative hospitalization duration, postoperative pain score and perioperative complications were compared between the two groups. The pathological conditions of surgical specimens were recorded. The postoperative recurrence rate of tumor and survival rate of patients were also recorded and compared. Results: The general clinical features were comparable between the two groups, and there were no perioperative deaths. The operation time in NOSE group was slightly longer than that in LA group, without statistically significant difference (p=0.130). In NOSE group, the amount of intraoperative bleeding was significantly smaller than in LA group [(59.31±14.64) mL vs. (75.41±18.16) mL, p<0.001], the postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) score was significantly lower than that in LA group [(4.2±1.6) points vs. (5.9±1.4) points, p<0.001], and the postoperative exhaust time and regular diet time were significantly shorter than those in LA group [(2.1±1.0) d vs. (2.6±1.2) d, p=0.039, (3.8±1.1) d vs. (4.4±1.4) d, p=0.030]. The cosmetic result in NOSE group was better than that in LA group [(8.0±1.5) vs. (6.4±1.1), p<0.001]. Moreover, the comparison results of surgical specimens showed that there were no statistically significant differences in the intestine resection length, proximal and distal resection margins, tumor size, number of lymph nodes dissected and TNM stage of tumor between the two groups (p>0.05). The postoperative tumor recurrence rate had no significant difference between the two groups (p=0.359), and the Log-rank test revealed that the disease-free survival (DFS) rate had no statistically significant difference between the two groups (p=0.280). Conclusions: NOSE without abdominal incision has a comparable short-term clinical efficacy to conventional laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of sigmoid cancer and upper rectal cancer, but it significantly reduces the amount of intraoperative bleeding and lowers the pain of patients, with rapid postoperative recovery and high safety, so it is worthy of clinical popularization.

Long-term oncologic outcomes of natural orifice specimen extraction surgery versus conventional laparoscopic-assisted resection in the treatment of rectal cancer: a propensity-score matching study

Comparison of natural orifice specimen extraction surgery and conventional laparoscopic-assisted resection in the treatment effects of low rectal cancer

Short-term outcomes of Transrectal Natural Orifice Specimen extraction compared with conventional minimally invasive surgery for selected patients with colorectal cancer: a propensity score matching analysis and literature review

Evaluating Short-Term and Survival Outcomes of Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction Surgery for Colorectal Cancer: A Single-Centre Retrospective Study

Short-term and long-term survival outcomes for transrectal specimen extraction after laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: a propensity-score matching study

Short-term and long-term outcomes of natural orifice specimen extraction surgeries (NOSES) in rectal cancer: a comparison study of NOSES and non-NOSES

Comparative short- and long-term outcomes of three techniques of natural orifice specimen extraction surgery for rectal cancer

Comparison Between Robotic Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction Surgery And Traditional Laparoscopic Low Anterior Resection For Middle And Low Rectal Cancer: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis

Efficacy of natural duct specimen extraction versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: a single-centre retrospective analysis

Short-term clinical outcomes and five-year survival analysis of laparoscopic-assisted transanal natural orifice specimen extraction versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for sigmoid and rectal cancer: a single-center retrospective study

Comparison of transabdominal wall specimen retrieval and natural orifice specimen extraction robotic surgery in the outcome of colorectal cancer treatment

Natural orifice specimen extraction surgery versus conventional laparoscopic-assisted resection for colorectal cancer in elderly patients: a propensity-score matching study

Retrospective analysis of immediate and long-term results of NOSES technique and conventional laparoscopic-assisted resection in patients with colorectal cancer

Comparison of efficacy between natural orifice specimen extraction without abdominal incision and conventional laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of sigmoid colon cancer and upper rectal cancer

Comparison of robotic-assisted and laparoscopic-assisted natural orifice specimen extraction surgery in short-terms outcomes of middle rectal cancer

Robotic natural orifice specimen extraction surgery versus robotic transabdominal specimen extraction surgery for early-stage rectal cancer: a multicenter propensity score-matched analysis (in China)

Short-term and Oncological Outcomes of Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction Surgery (NOSES) for Colorectal Cancer in China: a National Database Study of 5055 Patients

Clinical outcomes and prognostic factors of robotic assisted rectal cancer resection alone versus robotic rectal cancer resection with natural orifice extraction: a matched analysis

Propensity score–matched comparison between totally laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with transcolonic natural orifice specimen extraction and conventional laparoscopic surgery with mini-laparotomy in the treatment of ascending colon cancer (with video)

Laparoscopic resection with natural orifice specimen extraction versus conventional laparoscopy for colorectal disease: a meta-analysis

Comparative analysis of the safety and effectiveness of robotic natural orifice specimen extraction versus laparoscopic surgery for colorectal tumors through systematic review and meta-analysis