Abstract:Background:Natural orifice specimen extraction surgery (NOSES) is currently widely used in left-sided colorectal cancer. Some clinical comparative studies have been conducted, providing evidence of its safety and oncological benefits. However, these studies are typically characterized by small sample sizes and short postoperative follow-up periods. Consequently, in this research, the authors adopt the propensity score matching method to undertake a large-scale retrospective comparative study on NOSES colectomy for left-sided colorectal cancer, with the goal of further augmenting the body of evidence-based medical support for NOSES.Methods:This retrospective study involved patients who underwent NOSES colectomy and conventional laparoscopic (CL) colectomy for left-sided colorectal cancer between January 2014 and April 2021. In the NOSES group, specimens were extracted through the anus with the help of a Cai tube (homemade invention: ZL201410168748.2). The patients were matched at a ratio of 1:1 according to age, sex, BMI, tumor diameter, tumor location (descending and splenic flexure colon/ sigmoid colon/ middle and upper rectum), tumor height from anal verge, ASA grade, previous abdominal surgery, clinical pathologic stage, preoperative CEA. After matching, 132 patients in the NOSES group and 132 patients in the CL group were eligible for analysis.Results:Compared with CL group, NOSES group was associated with decreased postoperative maximum pain score (2.6 +/- 0.7 vs. 4.7 +/- 1.7, P=0.000), less additional analgesia required (6.8 vs. 34.8%, P=0.000), faster time to passage of flatus (2.3 +/- 0.6 days vs. 3.3 +/- 0.7 days, P=0.000), less wound infection (0.0 vs. 6.1%, P=0.007), and longer operative time (212.5 +/- 45.8 min vs. 178.0 +/- 43.4 min, P=0.000). No significant differences were observed in estimated blood loss, time to resume regular diet, postoperative hospital stay, conversion to open surgery or conventional minilaparotomy, total morbidity, readmission, mortality, pathologic outcomes, and Wexner incontinence score between groups. After a median follow-up of 63.0 months, the 5-year overall survival rates were 88.3 versus 85.0% (P=0.487), disease-free survival rates were 82.9 versus 83.6% (P=0.824), and the local recurrence rates were 4.4 versus 4.0% (P=0.667) in the NOSES and CL groups, respectively.Conclusions:This study suggests that NOSES colectomy using a Cai tube for left-sided colorectal cancer is a safe and feasible option with better cosmetic results, less pain, faster recovery of gastrointestinal function, and comparable long-term clinical and oncologic outcomes to CL colectomy.

Short-term and long-term outcomes of natural orifice specimen extraction surgeries (NOSES) in rectal cancer: a comparison study of NOSES and non-NOSES

Evaluating Short-Term and Survival Outcomes of Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction Surgery for Colorectal Cancer: A Single-Centre Retrospective Study

Long-term oncologic outcomes of natural orifice specimen extraction surgery versus conventional laparoscopic-assisted resection in the treatment of rectal cancer: a propensity-score matching study

Comparison of natural orifice specimen extraction surgery and conventional laparoscopic-assisted resection in the treatment effects of low rectal cancer

Comparative short- and long-term outcomes of three techniques of natural orifice specimen extraction surgery for rectal cancer

Clinical Efficacy and Quality of Life after Transrectal Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction for the Treatment of Middle and Upper Rectal Cancer.

Short-term and Oncological Outcomes of Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction Surgery (NOSES) for Colorectal Cancer in China: a National Database Study of 5055 Patients

The Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction Surgery Compared with Conventional Laparoscopy for Colorectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Efficacy and Long-Term Oncological Outcomes

Laparoscopy-Assisted Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction To Treat Tumors Of The Sigmoid Colon And Rectum: The Short- And Long-Term Outcomes Of A Retrospective Study

Safety Analysis of Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction Surgery for Colorectal Cancer.

Transrectal Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction (NOSE) with Oncological Safety: A Prospective and Randomized Trial.

Short-term outcomes of Transrectal Natural Orifice Specimen extraction compared with conventional minimally invasive surgery for selected patients with colorectal cancer: a propensity score matching analysis and literature review

Short-term clinical outcomes and five-year survival analysis of laparoscopic-assisted transanal natural orifice specimen extraction versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for sigmoid and rectal cancer: a single-center retrospective study

Short- and Long-Term Outcomes As Well As Anal Function of Transanal Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction Surgery Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery for Sigmoid Colon or Rectal Cancer Resection: a Retrospective Study with over 5-Year Follow-Up

Comparative Long-Term Outcomes of Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction Surgery and Conventional Laparoscopic Colectomy for Left-Sided Colorectal Cancer: a Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

Natural orifice specimen extraction surgery versus conventional laparoscopic-assisted resection for colorectal cancer in elderly patients: a propensity-score matching study

Efficacy of natural duct specimen extraction versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: a single-centre retrospective analysis

Retrospective analysis of immediate and long-term results of NOSES technique and conventional laparoscopic-assisted resection in patients with colorectal cancer

Short-term Efficacy of Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction Surgery for Low Rectal Cancer

Short-term and long-term survival outcomes for transrectal specimen extraction after laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: a propensity-score matching study

Comparison of robotic-assisted and laparoscopic-assisted natural orifice specimen extraction surgery in short-terms outcomes of middle rectal cancer