Strategic Information Sharing of Online Platforms as Resellers or Marketplaces

Yong Zha,Quan Li,Tingliang Huang,Yugang Yu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2022.1397

2022-10-19

Marketing Science

Abstract:We study an online platform’s demand information sharing strategy in a distribution channel where a manufacturer distributes products through both platform and seller channels.

business

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Information Sharing Strategies in a Hybrid-Format Online Retailing Supply Chain

Tong-Yuan Wang,Yan-Lai Li,Hong-Tai Yang,Kwai-Sang Chin,Zeng-Qiang Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2020.1746851

IF: 9.018

2020-01-01

International Journal of Production Research

Abstract:This paper considers a hybrid-format online retailing supply chain in which a manufacturer sells products to an online retailer and an intermediary with a wholesale contract, the retailer sells them through the intermediary by paying a commission fee (i.e. agency selling format), and the intermediary resells products as an e-tailer (i.e. reselling format). We use a theoretical model to answer a key question: whether the intermediary has an incentive to share demand information with others, and if it shares, which strategy is most beneficial to each member? Four information-sharing models are established and the results show that the intermediary always has incentive to share information voluntarily, and the best strategy strongly depends on the channel competition intensity and proportional fee. In addition, the manufacturer (retailer) can obtain profit if the intermediary only shares information with him (her), and all members can achieve a Pareto improvement (i.e. win-win-win situation) when both the manufacturer and retailer are informed. We further examine the impact of platform cost to demonstrate the robustness of results. When manufacturer cooperates with the retailer, the intermediary always intends to share information, whereas it has no incentive to do so if the intermediary and retailer make a coalition.
Information Sharing Across Competing Platforms with Varying Information Capabilities

Haoruo Zhu,Yaodong Ni,Yongbo Xiao

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2024.11.048

IF: 6.4

2024-01-01

European Journal of Operational Research

Abstract:Competing online retail platforms frequently function as both agency and reselling channels. This paper explores a manufacturer’s channel selection strategy in the context of downstream platform competition and information sharing, taking into account the platforms’ varying levels of information capability. Our research indicates that the manufacturer opts for a hybrid channel approach. Competing platforms aim to be selected as agency channels by offering information sharing and reduced commission fees. Interestingly, the manufacturer chooses the platform with lesser information capability as her agency channel to gain access to shared demand data, while opting for the platform with greater capability as reselling channel without accessing his demand data. The platform with inferior information capability is more inclined to establish a revenue-sharing partnership with the manufacturer to mitigate risks, leading him to decrease his commission rate to attract the manufacturer to select him as the agency channel. We demonstrate that, under conditions of demand uncertainty, a significant distinction between agency and reselling channels lies in the distribution of risk, i.e., whether the platform assumes the risk alone or shares it with the manufacturer. Furthermore, we highlight the free-ride effect, wherein an agency platform can benefit from his rival’s superior information capability. As a result, a complex relationship, characterized by both cooperation and rivalry, may develop between the two platforms.
Selling Formats and Platform Information Sharing under Manufacturer Competition

Xue Li,Shilu Tong,Xiaoqiang Cai,Jian Chen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/nav.22184

2024-01-01

Abstract:Online retail platforms have increasingly utilized big data technologies to gather demand information, which is then shared with upstream manufacturers employing various selling modes, including a hybrid format that encompasses both direct and indirect selling. Previous studies have suggested that platforms should refrain from sharing demand information with manufacturers engaged in indirect selling. In this study, we present a game-theoretic model to examine the factors influencing the online platform's decision to share information with an indirect selling manufacturer and under what conditions. Our initial analysis, considering exogenous selling formats in the base model, reveals that the platform's information sharing behavior is primarily influenced by selling format structures, commission fee rates, and competition intensity. The platform always has an incentive to share information with direct selling manufacturers; however, under a hybrid selling format, information sharing with indirect selling manufacturers may occur, particularly when both the commission fee rate and competition intensity are relatively high. We extend our investigation to explore the platform's optimal format-dependent information sharing behavior, accounting for manufacturers' endogenous selling format decisions, and demonstrate the robustness of our main findings from the base model. Overall, our research offers valuable insights and guidelines to assist online platforms in making informed decisions about their information sharing practices.
The Impact of Platform’s Information Sharing on Manufacturer Encroachment and Selling Format Decision

Canran Gong,Joshua Ignatius,Huaming Song,Junwu Chai,Steven James Day

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2024.03.036

IF: 6.4

2024-01-01

European Journal of Operational Research

Abstract:Motivated by recent practice observations, we consider an incumbent manufacturer who has an existing wholesale contract with an e -commerce platform, which the latter sells as a private label product in its online marketplace. In this context, the manufacturer launches its follower product, which will coexist alongside the private label product on the platform. We study the interplay between the manufacturer's choice of selling format (i.e., reselling or agency) and how this choice influences the platform's decision to share (or not to share) demand information with the manufacturer (i.e., information sharing policy). In particular, we examine how the platform's information -sharing policy, depending on its perceived information accuracy, impacts the manufacturer's selling format decision. Using game -theoretic analyses, we find that under low perceived information accuracy, the manufacturer adopts the agency format when the commission rate is low but the reselling format when the commission rate is high. However, the platform withholds the demand information. More interestingly, when the commission rate and perceived information accuracy are both high, the manufacturer switches from the reselling to the agency format and this induces the platform to share demand information. This benefits both the manufacturer and the platform with the Pareto-improving zone expanding when perceived information accuracy is at least moderate but shrinking when the market size potential of the follower product increases. Ultimately, both parties can benefit from information sharing once in business and when the commission rate is high. The platform should also invest in greater information accuracy in such conditions.
Downstream Information Sharing and Sales Channel Selection in a Platform Economy

Hong Zheng,Guo Li,Xu Guan,Suresh Sethi,Yu Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2021.102512

IF: 10.047

2021-01-01

Transportation Research Part E Logistics and Transportation Review

Abstract:We investigate an online retailer’s information sharing strategy with a supplier who has already sold products through the online retailer’s retail channel. The supplier now decides whether or not to open a commission channel on the retailer’s online marketplace. When engaged in the commission channel, the supplier can directly sell his products to customers by paying a fixed entry fee and a proportional commission fee to the online retailer. We show that the online retailer may have an incentive to share the demand information with the supplier, and such an action may induce the supplier to establish the commission channel. This inducement effect sheds some new intuitions to the literature. Several extensions are considered to verify the robustness of our results. In specific, we also consider a variation of the model in which the supplier leads by making the channel establishment decision before the online retailer’s decision on information sharing, and we identify the firms’ preferences between the two models. Moreover, even with a fully competitive market or with an exogenous wholesale price, our results hold qualitatively.
Marketplace or reseller? The effect of asymmetric selling cost and demand information

Mengying Zhang,Zhennan Yuan,Ningning Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/k-07-2023-1244

IF: 2.352

2024-02-28

Kybernetes

Abstract:Purpose We explore the driving forces behind the channel choices of the manufacturer and the platform by considering asymmetric selling cost and demand information. Design/methodology/approach This paper develops game-theoretical models to study different channel strategies for an E-commerce supply chain, in which a manufacturer distributes products through a platform that may operate in either the marketplace channel or the reseller channel. Findings Three primary models are built and analyzed. The comparison results show that the platform would share demand information in the reseller channel only if the service cost performance is relatively high. Besides, with an increasing selling cost, the equilibrium channel might shift from the marketplace to the reseller. With increasing information accuracy, the manufacturer tends to select the marketplace channel, while the platform tends to select the reseller channel if the service cost performance is low and tends to select the marketplace channel otherwise. Practical implications All these results have been numerically verified in the experiments. At last, we also resort to numerical study and find that as the service cost performance increases, the equilibrium channel may shift from the reseller channel to the marketplace channel. These results provide managerial guidance to online platforms and manufacturers regarding strategic decisions on channel management. Originality/value Although prior research has paid extensive attention to the driving forces behind the online channel choice between marketplace and reseller, there is at present few study considering the case where a manufacturer selling through an online platform faces a demand information disadvantage in the reseller channel and sales inefficiency in the marketplace channel. To fill this research gap, our work illustrates the interaction between demand information asymmetry and selling cost asymmetry to identify the equilibrium channel strategy and provides useful managerial guidelines for both online platforms and manufacturers.

computer science, cybernetics
Upstream information sharing in platform-based e-commerce with retail plan adjustment

Jian Zhang,Barrie R. Nault

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2023.114099

IF: 6.969

2023-10-01

Decision Support Systems

Abstract:We examine the incentive of an e-commerce platform to share advanced market demand information with a seller offering an assortment of products on its platform. The platform can operate either as a reseller, setting retail prices, or as a marketplace provider, earning commission fees. The shared information comprises the preferences of the consumers who shop on the platform. With this shared information, the seller can adjust its retail plan according to revealed consumer preferences in each planning cycle. Our analysis revolves around three factors: market variability, the cost of adjusting the retail plan, and the intensity of in-platform competition faced by the seller. Our results indicate that in the reseller setting the platform can be either better off or worse off with information sharing, whereas in the commission fee setting the platform invariably benefits from information sharing. If the platform shares information, it's generally beneficial for consumers in the reseller setting but could be harmful in the commission fee setting. We propose a price ceiling mechanism to incentivize information sharing. Our findings reveal that this price ceiling mechanism is superior to the subsidy mechanism as it yields benefits for all parties - the seller, the platform, and consumers - through information sharing. These results offer valuable insights to e-commerce platforms regarding strategic decisions on information sharing services and contract design to ensure mutual benefits.

computer science, information systems, artificial intelligence,operations research & management science
The Impact of Platform’s Information Sharing on Platform’s Private Label under Manufacturer Encroachment and Selling Format Decision

Canran Gong,Joshua Ignatius,Huaming Song,Junwu Chai,Steven James Day

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2024.03.036

IF: 6.4

2024-01-01

European Journal of Operational Research

Abstract:Motivated by recent practice observations, we consider an incumbent manufacturer who has an existing wholesale contract with a e-commerce platform, which the latter sells as a private label product in its online marketplace. In this context, the manufacturer launches its follower product, which will coexist alongside the private label product on the platform. We study the interplay between the manufacturer's choice of selling format (i.e., reselling or agency) and how this choice influences the platform's decision to share (or not to share) demand information with the manufacturer (i.e., information sharing policy). In particular, we examine how the manufacturer's selling format choice is impacted by the platform's information sharing policy when subjected to perceived information accuracy. Using game-theoretic analyses, we find that under low perceived information accuracy, the manufacturer adopts the agency format when the commission rate is low but the reselling format when the commission rate is high. However, the platform withholds the demand information. More interestingly, when the commission rate and perceived information accuracy are both high, the manufacturer switches from the reselling to the agency format and this induces the platform to share demand information. This benefits both the manufacturer and the platform with the Pareto-improving zone expanding when perceived information accuracy is at least moderate but shrinking when the market size potential of the follower product increases. Ultimately, both parties can benefit from information sharing once in business and when the commission rate is high. The platform should also invest in greater information accuracy in such conditions.
Platform sharing: From reseller to marketplace

Yonghong Sun,Jinfeng Liu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2021.101067

IF: 6

2021-07-01

Electronic Commerce Research and Applications

Abstract:We examine the motivations for an online retailer that exclusively resells goods to open its platform to competing sellers. We further examine competing seller's incentives to join such a platform. The retailer can receive rent and commission from the competing sellers or third-party (3P) sellers who join the platform. Further, these 3P sellers can increase their customer reach through the retailer's platform. However, the competition between them may intensify as both parties sell identical products on the same platform. This study develops a game-theoretic model to formulate the strategic interaction between an online retailer and a 3P seller who are selling an identical product in the market. According to our findings, opening the platform changes the rules of the game. By charging rent and commission, the retailer can reduce their price competition with the 3P seller. In particular, the retailer has more control over the 3P seller's retail price through charging commission. Hence, both parties benefit from coopetition if consumers are insensitive to price changes. Certainly, if consumers are sensitive to price changes, it may not be in the retailer's interests to open up the platform. Additionally, platform sharing provides consumers with an additional channel from which to purchase products. However, consumers are at a disadvantage as they have to pay a higher price than they did before the execution of the platform opening strategy. In conclusion, the retailer's choice to open up its platform decreases social welfare SW.

business,computer science, information systems, interdisciplinary applications
Information Sharing in the Hybrid-Format Supply Chain

Yuansheng Wei,Pei Huang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3301639

2019-01-01

SSRN Electronic Journal

Abstract:In a hybrid-format supply chain, an intermediary serves as a reseller as well as a marketplace. This paper studies the intermediary’s incentive to share the privately observed demand in- formation with its upstream supplier when the supplier can also engage in the marketplace offered by the intermediary in a hybrid-format model. Conventional wisdom suggests that an intermediary is averse to sharing the demand information with its supplier due to the double marginalization effect of information sharing. We show that an intermediary may voluntarily establish an information sharing channel with its supplier when the intermediary engages in a hybrid-format supply chain. The intuition is that information sharing shifts power upstream, which enhances the supplier’s incentive to engage in the marketplace. The intermediary benefits from the lessened double marginalization effect and revenue sharing from the marketplace. This strategic role of information sharing is in contrast to most previous literature. We also find that when the proportional fee is not high, the supplier prefers to engage in the marketplace regardless of channel substitutability; when the proportional fee and channel substitutability is high, the intermediary withholds information and the supplier only resells through the intermediary. Our findings not only complement the emerging hybrid-format model literature but also develop relatively new insights on information sharing issue in the supply chain.
Information Transparency and Business Mode Selection in Online Platforms under Manufacturer Competition

Lunhai Liang,Fei Ye

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114324

IF: 11.3

2024-01-01

Journal of Business Research

Abstract:In this study, we investigate the interaction between an online platform’s information sharing strategy and its business mode choice in a supply chain with two competing manufacturers both selling through a common online platform under demand uncertainty. The online platform possesses private demand information and arranges with each manufacturer either a reselling mode (R) or an agency mode (A). We find that the online platform prefers not to share information in the RR mode, but prefers to do so with manufacturers that adopt the agency mode in the AA and AR/RA modes. Interestingly, in the AA mode, the online platform prefers to share information with only one manufacturer, rather than both, depending on the level of upstream competition. Counter-intuitively, although both manufacturers always benefit from information sharing, they do not always prefer to possess an information advantage over their competitor, especially when the competitors adopt the reselling mode. Furthermore, we find that the impact of information sharing on business mode choice depends on the level of upstream competition, commission rate and the information value. The transparency generated by the platform’s information sharing will enhance the probability of the AA and AR modes being adopted. Our findings can provide important managerial implications for the differentiated information sharing strategies of online platforms such Amazon and Tmall.
Information sharing strategy in supply chains: The role of C2M

Xue Chen,Bo Li,Minxue Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2024.123294

IF: 8.5

2024-02-01

Expert Systems with Applications

Abstract:This paper constructs a supply chain model consisting of two manufacturers and one platform, where the platform provides sales service to enhance the demand. The platform has demand information and decides whether and with which manufacturer to share the information. In practice, if the platform shares the information, the manufacturer can use the shared information to guide pricing decisions and further use Consumer-to-Manufacturer (C2M) strategy to drive product production. C2M means that the manufacturer produces products based on the shared information, making products satisfy consumers' needs, thereby increasing the market demand. Therefore, this paper uses a theoretical model to answer a key question: considering the role of C2M, whether the platform prefers to share demand information with others, and if the platform shares, which strategy is most beneficial to each player? First, this paper obtains the optimal equilibrium solutions under three strategies, that is, no information sharing (strategy NN ), information sharing with one manufacturer (strategy SN or strategy NS ), and information sharing with two manufacturers (strategy SS ). Second, this paper derives that the information effect is the highest for all players under strategy SS . Whether the platform shares information with one or two manufacturers, the market effect has positive influences on both players. The cost effect does not affect the platform but hurts the informed manufacturer. Third, the conditions of the platform sharing information are obtained. There is a sales service efficiency threshold, if the sales service is more efficient, the platform shares the information with one manufacturer; otherwise, strategy SS is optimal. Fourth, through comparative analysis, this paper points out that when the C2M costs are lower, both manufacturers prefer the platform to choose strategy SS . Interestingly, when the C2M costs are higher, both manufacturers want the competitor to have information, which is different from the conclusions of previous studies. In addition, strategy SS makes the platform, and two manufacturers achieve Pareto optimality under certain conditions. Finally, the results are verified by numerical experiments.

computer science, artificial intelligence,engineering, electrical & electronic,operations research & management science
Platform Information Transparency and Effects on Third‐Party Suppliers and Offline Retailers

Yushi Tsunoda,Yusuke Zennyo

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.13518

IF: 4.638

2021-07-26

Production and Operations Management

Abstract:We examine a model in which a supplier sells products through an online platform and an offline retailer under conditions of demand uncertainty. The actual demand potential can be observed (or predicted accurately using rich sales data) by the platform and retailer, but not by the supplier. The model addresses the following issues. First, the supplier optimizes its multi-channel strategy, including a selling format choice in the online channel and optimal pricing. Specifically, although a traditional wholesale model is used offline, both wholesale and agency models are prepared online. Given a commission rate set by the platform for the agency model, the supplier chooses one selling format from the two models. The second one is related to the platform's information-sharing policy. The platform can commit to sharing its demand information with the supplier. This paper elucidates how the platform's information sharing alters the supplier's multi-channel management and subsequently affects the retailer eventually. Results show that the platform charges its commission rate so that the supplier chooses the agency model, unless the consumer demand is sufficiently uncertain. We also demonstrate that the platform's information sharing capability makes the agency model more likely to be adopted. However, information transparency arising from the platform's voluntary information disclosure can be unfavorable to the retailer. Finally, we demonstrate that, with information sharing, a shift from wholesale to agency models can be desirable not only for the platform and supplier, but also for the retailer (i.e., Pareto-improving).

operations research & management science,engineering, manufacturing
Information Sharing in an Online Marketplace with Co‐opetitive Sellers

Guo Li,Lin Tian,Hong Zheng

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.13460

IF: 4.638

2021-07-17

Production and Operations Management

Abstract:In recent years, the rapid development of online marketplaces has given rise not only to co‐opetitive relationships between sellers but also to information asymmetries between online marketplaces and sellers. This paper studies information sharing in an e‐commerce setting consisting of an online marketplace, an upstream manufacturer and a reseller, where the online marketplace possesses superior demand information, while the manufacturer and reseller engage in a co‐opetitive structure. The reseller procures products from the manufacturer under a wholesale price contract, and both the manufacturer and reseller sell the products through the online marketplace by paying a proportional commission fee. We examine four information‐sharing scenarios: no information sharing (S1), full information sharing (S2), information sharing only with the manufacturer (S3) and information sharing only with the reseller (S4). Our analysis shows that when the intensity of competition between the manufacturer and reseller is relatively low and demand variability is moderate, the online marketplace prefers full information sharing; otherwise, it prefers to share its demand information only with the manufacturer. Moreover, interestingly, we find that the manufacturer always prefers the scenario with full information sharing to the scenario that endows her with an informational advantage over the reseller. In contrast, depending on the competitive intensity and demand variability, the reseller prefers either the scenario in which the online marketplace shares demand information with him only or that in which demand information is shared with the manufacturer only. Furthermore, we find that the equilibrium information‐sharing outcome can be either full information sharing or information sharing only with the manufacturer. The rationale behind these results hinges on the interactions among the signaling cost, effciency effect, and co‐opetitive relationship between the manufacturer and reseller.

operations research & management science,engineering, manufacturing
The Incentives for Information Sharing in Online Retail Platforms

Qinjia Zhong,Jianjun Wang,Zongbao Zou,Xiaofan Lai

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2023.103050

IF: 10.047

2023-01-01

Transportation Research Part E Logistics and Transportation Review

Abstract:Compared with the traditional brick-and-mortar retail industry, e-commerce has numerous advantages in the collection of consumer demand information, and big data technology can help online platforms forecast accurate demand information from the collected data, which can then be used to improve business operations. To investigate the incentives for sharing the forecast information with or without platform encroachment, this paper establishes stylized analytical models in an e-commerce setting consisting of a manufacturer, an online platform and a thirdparty retailer (as a reseller). Depending on whether the online platform encroachment happens or not, we consider two different platform operation modes, namely, the mode without platform encroachment where only the third-party retailer sells products, and the mode with platform encroachment where both the online platform and the third-party retailer sell products. Our analysis shows that when the online platform does not encroach, it has no incentives to share forecast information with the manufacturer, but always has incentives to share forecast information with the third-party retailer. Interestingly, when the online platform encroaches, the online platform may share forecast information, depending on the level of substitutability between products and commission rate charged by it, either only with the third-party retailer, or with both the manufacturer and the third-party retailer, or with none of them.
Investment strategies of information-provision technology in the platform-based supply chain

Xu Tian,Mingzheng Wang,Yang Xu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/nav.22155

2024-01-01

Abstract:On retailing platforms, several information-provision technologies are adopted to gain profit, such as production video ads service, live streaming service, and virtual reality/augmented reality tech. In this article, we focus on the investment strategies of information-provision tech and its impact on the platform-based supply chain. To this end, we develop a general model under which the platform invests in information-provision tech for homogenous sellers and consumers search for products on the platform. Our results show that the platform should adopt a higher investment level in information-provision tech for the products with the unit search cost or products' information uncertainty degree being medium. Also, a more competitive environment can lead to a lower platform's investment level in information-provision tech when the number of browsing products is sufficiently large. Interestingly, we find that for a large unit search cost or small uncertainty degree of products' information, investing in information-provision tech can benefit the platform's and sellers' profit. In addition, if the number of browsing products is large, investing in information-provision tech can increase the consumer surplus and social welfare. Lastly, our results hold for a broad class of distributions of products' information uncertainty value and other practical cases. Our studies can help the platform to understand the roles of information-provision tech and provide some practical management insights.
Voluntary information disclosure of an e-commerce platform under reselling, marketplace, and hybrid selling

Jia Shi,Lap Keung Chu,Huajiang Luo

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2023.109011

IF: 11.251

2023-08-12

International Journal of Production Economics

Abstract:This study investigates an e-commerce platform's incentive to voluntarily disclose demand information to an upstream manufacturer. In contrast to previous studies that emphasize the platform's mandatory (or ex-ante ) information disclosure, this study examines voluntary (or ex-post ) information disclosure, which allows the platform to selectively decide whether to perform information disclosure based on the level of forecast demand. The typical online selling channels in which the platform or the manufacturer (or both) play the role of seller are identified as reselling, marketplace, and hybrid cases. In each transaction case, the interactions between the platform's information disclosure strategy, the level of forecast demand, the platform's forecasting capability, the degree of demand uncertainty, and channel substitutability are analyzed. We find that information on good market demand should be withheld in the reselling case, information indicating a slightly below-average market condition should be withheld in the marketplace case, and information on good or poor demand should be withheld in the hybrid case. The platform is more likely to perform information disclosure as the forecasting capability or the degree of demand uncertainty increases. Moreover, both the platform and the manufacturer can benefit from a well-formulated voluntary information disclosure strategy. Our findings show e-commerce platforms how to better exploit demand forecast information in a voluntary disclosure setting and provide an explanation for practices such as their focus on improving their forecasting capability and market potential.

engineering, manufacturing, industrial,operations research & management science
Information Sharing and Personalized Pricing in Online Platforms

Yihong Hu,Guo Li,Mengqi Liu,Shengnan Qu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/10591478231225178

IF: 4.638

2024-01-01

Production and Operations Management

Abstract:With the rise of big data technology, an online platform can easily gather customer information to engage in price discrimination and obtain additional profits. Sharing customer information with a third-party seller increases the platform’s commission and information revenue, but the seller’s personalized pricing using customer information intensifies the price competition, which may damage the profitability of the platform’s own product. Whether to share information remains an unsolved strategy decision for the platform. We employ a game-theoretic model to characterize the interplay of information sharing by the platform and the pricing strategies of two firms. We consequently study four basic scenarios where the two firms adopt either uniform or personalized pricing policies. In equilibrium, the seller does not always have incentives to acquire information, and the platform is not always willing to share information. Intriguingly, with different combinations of the commission rate and the new consumer ratio, the equilibrium of the overall system has four possible results where the information may not be used for price discrimination. With a relatively high commission rate and a low new consumer ratio, the platform no longer pursues a demand for its own product and lets the seller occupy the whole market, which leads to the lowest consumer surplus and social welfare. We finally show that in the event of a relatively high commission rate, prohibiting information sharing increases consumer surplus and social welfare, verifying the necessity of regulations. These results could provide useful guidelines for platform managers and regulators to better design information sharing and price discrimination policies.
Supplier Encroachment, Information Sharing, and Channel Structure in Online Retail Platforms

Albert Y. Ha,Huajiang Luo,Weixin Shang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.13607

IF: 4.638

2021-11-26

Production and Operations Management

Abstract:In this study, we develop a game‐theoretic model to study the encroachment and information sharing decisions in a supply chain with a manufacturer selling through an online retail platform. In the base model, the manufacturer decides whether to encroach or not by selling through an agency channel, in addition to an existing reselling channel, at the same platform, who decides whether or not to share information with the manufacturer. We fully characterize the equilibrium decisions and show how they depend on the commission rate of the agency channel, channel substitutability, and information accuracy. Our analysis unfolds a novel wholesale price effect that extends related results in the literature. We also show that encroachment and information sharing are complementary, and therefore managers should not ignore the impact of one decision on the other decision even when the latter is not a primary motivation of the former. We study several model extensions to obtain additional insights and show that the major findings of the base model are robust and remain mostly valid when some modeling assumptions are changed.

operations research & management science,engineering, manufacturing
The Impact of Platform’s Information Sharing on Manufacturer’s Selling Format Entry Decision

Shiliang Cui,Steven W. Day,Canran Gong,Joshua Ignatius,Huaming SONG

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4221485

2022-01-01

SSRN Electronic Journal

Abstract:Download This Paper Open PDF in Browser Add Paper to My Library Share: Permalink Using these links will ensure access to this page indefinitely Copy URL The Impact of Platform's Information Sharing on Manufacturer's Selling Format Entry Decision 32 Pages Posted: 28 Sep 2022 See all articles by Shiliang CuiShiliang CuiGeorgetown University - McDonough School of BusinessSteven W. DayZhejiang UniversityCanran Gongaffiliation not provided to SSRNJoshua IgnatiusUniversity of Exeter Business School; Nanjing University of Science and TechnologyHuaming SONGZhejiang University Date Written: September 16, 2022 Abstract Problem definition: We consider an incumbent manufacturer who has an existing wholesale contract with a platform for which the latter sells as a private label on its platform. In this context, the manufacturer intends to launch its follower label which will coexist with the private label on the platform. We study the interplay between the manufacturer's choice of selling format (i.e., reselling or agency contract) and how it influences the platform's decision to share (or not to share) the demand information with the manufacturer (i.e, information sharing policy). In particular, we examine how the platform's information sharing policy impacts the manufacturer's contract choice when subjected to information accuracy. Methodology/Results: Using game-theoretic analyses, we find that when the information accuracy is low, the manufacturer adopts the agency format when the commission rate is low but the reselling format when the commission rate is high. However, the platform withholds the demand information. More interestingly, when the commission rate and information accuracy are both high, the manufacturer switches from reselling to agency format, and this induces the platform to switch from no information sharing to information sharing which benefits both the manufacturer and the platform (i.e., Pareto-improving). In addition, the "Pareto-improving" region expands with information accuracy. Managerial implications: Although it is not in the interest of platforms to invest in making demand information open access as a primary feature to attract new manufacturers, both parties can benefit from information sharing once in business and when the commission rate is high. The platform should also invest in infrastructure supporting greater information accuracy in such conditions. Keywords: Supply chain management, Selling format, Information sharing, Product competition Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation Cui, Shiliang and Day, Steven W. and Gong, Canran and Ignatius, Joshua and SONG, Huaming, The Impact of Platform's Information Sharing on Manufacturer's Selling Format Entry Decision (September 16, 2022). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4221485 Shiliang Cui (Contact Author) Georgetown University - McDonough School of Business ( email ) 3700 O Street, NWWashington, DC 20057United States Steven W. Day Zhejiang University ( email ) Canran Gong affiliation not provided to SSRN Joshua Ignatius University of Exeter Business School Nanjing University of Science and Technology Huaming SONG Zhejiang University Download This Paper Open PDF in Browser Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN? Place Job Opening Paper statistics Downloads 4 Abstract Views 10 PlumX Metrics Related eJournals IO: Theory eJournal Follow IO: Theory eJournal Subscribe to this fee journal for more curated articles on this topic FOLLOWERS 929 PAPERS 14,953 Supply Chain Management eJournal Follow Supply Chain Management eJournal Subscribe to this fee journal for more curated articles on this topic FOLLOWERS 812 PAPERS 1,548 Operations Management eJournal Follow Operations Management eJournal Subscribe to this fee journal for more curated articles on this topic FOLLOWERS 806 PAPERS 2,654 Feedback Feedback to SSRN Feedback (required) Email (required) Submit If you need immediate assistance, call 877-SSRNHelp (877 777 6435) in the United States, or +1 212 448 2500 outside of the United States, 8:30AM to 6:00PM U.S. Eastern, Monday - Friday. Submit a Paper Section 508 Text Only Pages SSRN Quick Links SSRN Solutions Research Paper Series Conference Papers Partners in Publishing Jobs & Announcements Newsletter Sign Up SSRN Rankings Top Papers Top Authors Top Organizations About SSRN SSRN Objectives Network Directors Presidential Letter Announcements Contact us FAQs Copyright Terms and Conditions Privacy Policy We use cookies to help provide and enhance our service and tailor content. To learn more, visit Cookie Settings. This page was processed by aws-apollo-4dc in 0.250 seconds

Strategic Information Sharing of Online Platforms as Resellers or Marketplaces

Information Sharing Strategies in a Hybrid-Format Online Retailing Supply Chain

Information Sharing Across Competing Platforms with Varying Information Capabilities

Selling Formats and Platform Information Sharing under Manufacturer Competition

The Impact of Platform’s Information Sharing on Manufacturer Encroachment and Selling Format Decision

Downstream Information Sharing and Sales Channel Selection in a Platform Economy

Marketplace or reseller? The effect of asymmetric selling cost and demand information

Upstream information sharing in platform-based e-commerce with retail plan adjustment

The Impact of Platform’s Information Sharing on Platform’s Private Label under Manufacturer Encroachment and Selling Format Decision

Platform sharing: From reseller to marketplace

Information Sharing in the Hybrid-Format Supply Chain

Information Transparency and Business Mode Selection in Online Platforms under Manufacturer Competition

Information sharing strategy in supply chains: The role of C2M

Platform Information Transparency and Effects on Third‐Party Suppliers and Offline Retailers

Information Sharing in an Online Marketplace with Co‐opetitive Sellers

The Incentives for Information Sharing in Online Retail Platforms

Investment strategies of information-provision technology in the platform-based supply chain

Voluntary information disclosure of an e-commerce platform under reselling, marketplace, and hybrid selling

Information Sharing and Personalized Pricing in Online Platforms

Supplier Encroachment, Information Sharing, and Channel Structure in Online Retail Platforms

The Impact of Platform’s Information Sharing on Manufacturer’s Selling Format Entry Decision